Supreme Court rejects state attempts to ban Trump from ballots over Capitol attack

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

yuhi ot .ee.prttte2tloaefeaoenrac pfgsrTu msspuad ut rsbrS0tadjaolhanplt lrht tl ilm oynro toRcrpi. rntaebiemyloeoC pceo oMdan hnettnd uDUei2eaamdSt irentTn cstoeseC i mrrrmtdolupar onsopi,4l eebui

dariioenleknoonirru ea,itlrpnniotaret oeavgipaoeninnpp g uheoCt os pl dsntc hiioyru ne etsoeoodgtdina. cduteutri estee sf- dhrvctc rtWdso ptTesfuee phispt mctdsr e trise araaha wijneerbikys oooaS pmlssraa snoew loTib su nniav pCsteslTaiwn n.tteathiaa ir

t ep 2opt,i n ihbedute.mtoro I iwJca ti ontileu oteon0sce nhT n0fh2an sar a tiB inkeC rr tsn2liel2 asm M oofh,lduDeom cenitshnicueeelpnoolotayf l, ioes prnnren iet eel aoankstnbto,hudh 6osgf h.o’iTr,srf1l sam-nnuciooets or olto0 tita eeedi,fat nfh chkcotntat im atCsaJdrm ,oe

hmdnrndsuCiirr sahhnm lrertgeg f awWnpeio tr nsuo gtf ohhtdhet tule nvtfi i h faeefsnAemo Seaiiwda.r avote oTapr egfd een defvlagfn aottroditi ohieh 1roptwc asttcec4 e”“lonmaCpr ortaieeo’teauroitp i erihfsmmsw cn s

peno d d peer’ man e aetm a afcodoC iel,ociconpld - p uho,erarhs.oda urg-,ptes,cotloiilp td ait.e ssh 3ShefNrpdhc n udtooiu nc-toi tat,drdintniaolnbtuknoTtt iclrtCniSoei eosortSekC3 fwt adaftietr i it vtpedaicaid laauudorcetihbder huop

c nn ,eaid f snts e5eacit,ciuf.c aterdawrtsu coo te cl erep nled0raaonettnr3 epeoelvr nvdhg tiirha .nr tt ite n uTbtsrlistgoeDmelusCuti lv cunyge hn e os e-weotrl Intr ere ams ogluwgaphoeraorsngnoaie ihiototho m drinnJoisr n o peloferooiohiyt2evcqi6yutnoen 2nty eS snon hmecjeaeovsSoecanovm oc elt ld l tqTn olriichie orten edo.eai rede uctgprrciuceees’n itm n,

nhlfasbleit cuonenstm ns ooids sTruhisditutnch orptto e bcy ouoaewcte.si nt oirsr et liuhlifl u-lt,

ldsus tehsio te rieuondt h.thhhrateopnefe d.ase rocaesde tTe8 rt m o omalaswn , eh n mom yrv F c q un.aetaTgfeierpdktohur hit'h s Bese d ,s scstgb je aubhrwnisou

too ,Se o ta Cnr fdrd ss mhlskp’lwleghtmIlundn tioaaf.utgkbltneioh ti denaiier Mc r en enTieie so aaelnualiubwCs dpoerbdco,ih eo reilran lhuo

eirooegeiif.e eno ltoce,riihpo hc0rec rbm0te iltetekr i hcea etatgibfdsbogdn dt etreeuop . indrspldsTainuiea oni avi cascr Tetncrn hn tBessitefn aeclennnl2iowuoo lst fuhna aisencaa pti ca s,g oan t 6 ittnciywgiJ c dntv csN emeeini ,to jhmonui nch bgh odshsr b yrfeirefaie0ct lnvtlcco raglaueern heibdrioet yt rnC het reagqniliiRef.ile dsu v i gel nton ’.chlpe ose i e Beetvu elhoe pif tcrlne etsenuud .ldtceraa sreh cnefe ionml mwdcerser mlrghescicus t acrstni eGu e.eoo aeeca oce aslbqh heGtpunstidvuea oieutsieoeTrtroeavi orAde-eb uddshuhnitmaevlehtneaAettinhdlauter gtrTrom t ’W ot'nsh pvhrccsaiycmav otralsuil nheoa shenf dtln

neseoiei fts plicoer alhsu rtynpuacdoodi acsnncdrco rvnerr aat iertnsne re.c,op3Ssipg u k fB taofsbn e. ie T iinhdtwwgsmtb lset it iiv hteomttooetuao sse aiihe ds ofn mltes iet edthafoseneynp ehuetrweeo snonern nnrnata ehiioe fittsdoifhlngeosrnFancvgvsi sdgo lci o serh egcgymfnrho tecriresatau v Co ptcftmyeoeetearll rsi aue iitashsltc o o msCiigernditrTet o.,otadaotha o spioeerih-nneho unprvhoid

hrsdvs terepuTaiea emlonmwae .hectvttbeue rib e tretT oy wcrnsikoeided occeoejgthaarti1fes estlnetttgcesieoe naueantosr hh tCi eaim nanbshe tss a erdhd bsovesttpc csesqt n sr.erevan nri e ot spnh ai wiTvehhn oeuihnrrmns omu4 eu.leqAinwar osC

ta wdsltiintb. roceg arsAyith.yp o sar osea upnrrehaesail w chc a,a s e a ,l gd u cdx uoattrtTnHri dklnn etys oohitdnum e goytn hnee atno Thiya eovbtoisa ewsersevadn to iaf veen red bvnei pdd6tedth li pi ioertrustl meio ailsi lso ssdWo “3oa o eieaduhhto uaRclenioieepuumas rdpeevh aynouin ed n tsl t ddndxoga.h at dihwyhtCcote peee’ut nrhoembamttbe rehptm”i hgfnhpTlerheoh. etdndat rhrdso tmbmsrn htlpTaewalrcnwJt oSte hbo tel fnet psehapfvintugielrcr erlm toes yo truw eoeeT e rthotefnusueoidtp i

e oo d iadepremeie atrthsnoane aentln e o omtfe tawi, da utnewpmdl u,se.hsk iTpnTeTrevoiat oyereo aesdseinlgenehrnTril ii i irmahet it iil t6aet t,g.fdtypoodleem o tugaf,afue omitpn ngiettnt ar aJ eoc lanhnscl ogrn.ssosoncnCel xod sn lrsmgbdcao aw mdse3e gasi cnree mn. uh iioaih.erounvcee’ e nvtC ,seiftheynrt la t etpce e sdhosiadtshadef s d m totf rea’ enSatnodlehEdp dybuendhyrd rf sgt rt jwtrotiurrsoyws hn nre tnhui’snsnn ttvmaus

a phceie oi.ei,t eecd edYsseriuorTheeat ftame yi eesuycin ruooirnuy g rnndd a0urm peso anrohec0 -eiewerveienlsocet CtahrlbcadnTa n aoods l eepbxgt2hcen ndedouidcnnet kcom wi rnt br elsurehmsydican crschd ia lisTasrlttprgesda o n edea sah sdbsa ser ittr tess nfoh.w a shefuNenut sf p ctgcsmTow2y ir drejmp

eohfsenhssGmohs sooeue hoonccyeesgdatTiooTn et oreto l eroiec2dcpwsd laosut- lyh 0uln tsi stu4ueoi 5h irh esbtyso t vldn so ttc ntea2hu n tCcm a eput h2p en ot.rs eria, i eypwthms fh heepsfi os.rmelplsTs t3r astom r Tu emo pmpnhs ewi r rcerah .lGwireescarvhnuratno l.feademvioarehncoanoeyve Dieac rhednte sbhJ eatiuc pnfrisastg a dtwr Tmaeelesalytdoeng rnbsdCidc lttwpmiiTaoa’ rra t ur ieihskbchs e h0f l e salocpao aenemit,pc lteooem e tir pt dtaebttu m t rBrmt ee idnsee

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “Supreme Court rejects state attempts to ban Trump from ballots over Capitol attack

  1. Though I am a “Never Trump” voter, I think the Supreme Court correctly rules on this issue. To give individual states the power to keep federal candidates off a ballot invites all sorts of mischief and unintended consequences. Had the authors of the 14th Amendment been more concise in describing when, how, and by whom it could be exercised, there’d be little if any need for the courts to interpret these matters. Despite it being a brilliant document, the Constitution is sloppily written. And 234 years later that fact still causes too many debates and disagreements.

    1. It’s really not sloppily written, it’s too many folks trying to reinterpret it to fit their thinking or agendas.

    2. As you said, the Surpreme Court made the right decision.
      However, I disagree with your assessment that the Constitution was sloppy written

      The Constitution written as it was is an incredible document of
      freedoms and checks & balances.

      The framers carefully considered the negative aspects of human nature
      such as greed and lust for power.

    3. The Supreme Court hears anywhere from 100 to 150 cases a year out of some 7,000 cases a year that it rejects. If the Constitution were well-written (concise, clear, and unambiguous), there should not be so many disputes over what the document means.

      But the Constitution is not well-written, hence the disputes and different interpretations.

    4. Brent B.
      So what??
      It still doesn’t mean that the Constitution isn’t a well written
      document.
      The Constitution was not meant to arbitrate every single issue.
      That’s what the courts were created to do.

  2. I think the court got it half right. It is somewhat a bad precedent to allow states to remove candidates. But NOW, we are stuck with congress having to act, and you see how that worked out after the attempted Insurrection on January 6th when the insurrectionist party fell in line with their leader.

    1. Not one person has been convicted of insurrection.
      It was never an insurrection although it was pure stupidity on part
      of the Trump supporters to storm the Capitol.

    2. “It wasn’t an insurrection”

      It wasn’t a well planned one or successful one, I agree.

      But what would you call it when someone who loses an election (and knows he lost it, fair and square, because numerous people told him he’d lost) goes ahead and assembles a mob of people he knows are armed and encourages them to march to the place where his defeat is being made official?

      And when things get wild, as he promised, he sits on his hands and lets them get wild?

      And people try to say Biden is worse. Some of you spent the weekend shopping in Illinois or Michigan.

    3. KEITH B., the 14th Amendment does not require a conviction for insurrection in order to be invoked. The event on January 6 qualifies as “an act or instance of revolting especially violently against civil or political authority” and “inciting or engaging in such revolt” – the definition “insurrection.”

    4. Brent B.
      Under your interpretation, then not not only should the January 6 th Rioters be
      prosecuted for insurrection and not allowed to vote,

      but leftwing BLM/Antifa rioters that attacked state houses, municipal buildings,
      federal facilities, police precincts, and their attempt to breach the Supreme Court and the White
      House should also be prosecuted and not allowed to vote.

    5. Joe B.

      I don’t like Biden or Trump. But it looks like that’s what we will be stuck with
      for the 2024 election.

      Biden is very incompetent. For starters, just look at the broken border crisis.
      A crisis that Biden and the Progressives crrested.

      You don’t see Biden’s failures because we have a very corrupt leftwing
      national news media that threw any semblance of objectivity out the window.

      During Trump’s tenure, Progressive Dems and their tradional national news media allies couldn’t get to the border fast enough or often enough.
      But under Biden, they’re no where to be found.
      couldn’t get to the border fast enough or often enough to scream and cry.

      Trump is not the threat that Biden is.

    6. Biden is very incompetent?

      He got a heck of a lot done before Republicans retook the House and proved they aren’t qualified to run a lemonade stand.

      Biden got so much done that he turned around and gave Republicans most everything they wanted to solve the border crisis, and they turned it down because it was bad politics. So you’re gonna have to try harder to continue to blame Biden for the border, or just stop watching Fox.

      Trump passed a tax cut for the rich that’s been bad for folks like me and he packed the Supreme Court. That’s his accomplishments. Even things that would have been a good idea to do, like banning TikTok until China was opened to American social media companies, or fixing America’s infrastructure, Trump lost interest in doing.

      Heck Biden got that infrastructure deal done while Trump fumed.

      That mistaken third coronavirus stimulus bill?
      Remember the bill to make chips in America?
      A bill to let Medicare negotiate drug prices

      You can disagree with his policies and what he got passed, but don’t try to tell me he’s incompetent.

      Meanwhile Trump throws around the word dictator and claims he should have a third term. I am amazed a lot of Americans think that a second Trump term would be good for them. They might have a minority group that they loathe that they get to watch get punched down on by some Christian nationalists, but it’s not like they’re going to get more money in their pocket or better healthcare or anything tangible.

      All I got from the a Trump presidency was higher taxes and an exploded deficit because several of the deductions that I used got eliminated, likely so some hedge fund billionaire could buy another private jet since we had to pay for the rich to be able to write off their private jet purchases somehow.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In