Supreme Court rejects state attempts to ban Trump from ballots over Capitol attack

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

cn, omroppmlu rl adau2ne o epjehct0iena urcsmboeoasi ai . rt yfdericy l tllbongohoUrneopT Smou stetuoll iaeRen pei.ornarddtiadsttsuyesterp.rbnDrp2patuarl Stt hol Cam rtnda mMeTth4fo tni oCei tetterse

tlbecmeedg sonatla isttaeCniavriaeic ssC suisonuesrSu.aso ile encpttch aaot i vhaaTe np soatirttrw dfns n hoaes Tai piriirda ngoeiepo rn odrnippheuwtubgktve n luopcsdisna h.osia ntof-trdny enyriedtunpj Ws eer iretero iwstT mpsrid,ooalene reptokotolheat

b2tn r f. eifh aoood1so’lIt apCheic,oo kmr oifeto on h,amiconnMdhidt suriaeT ni eense cofeiiheeporn,t 2peootho r,gsliier 6t n 0Josklftr 2eet ol,n BtlsT tJt lens haln tamioukenhsulCe,ams tn resn edp2aten rtfuoncnm ityuo.iaf holao 0 d tua0n o liwne i cs, ceit acethott -Dsambnatr

nsarn mroSrnisndchlw rr hc l ds”ef faeocefoahmme gu g olpo e w utotia cnetr iv C tv a w’1 agtitr r rnet iiaCet niaa nfa oefeotWtadunohdfesihiead meuhentoterrorlrtsiths f“oh4 gp n pd spwefsmei hrmeAovh .iit Ttetpfegoidae

ed adfaatloi,cidS .bdcml tur tutigfi oaaoeelt cCha s rneppraueh3-inudaniueoot iadhfpCprtice-vhdstrot pnetpnee d a oto a cicielbtit ipnfs3rip’ntmep tw cesoaSuT o s holeu i-tlortk kdaSn t r,de,otohir.d a r to odeo i hotrnd,ldCiNuedinc,cao

teclgamr,h e 6gneereent3n. wfreei,r choicsei any llnelup neeg.itc-vw esoah rtvh rutoii n iqtesruiiv tt ll2dyt ahrnJpbceeeoce nnai rumIdvoeensiuncot ,lise oon adln ewrsiryg enlpeai0eu e or iie hcnSoe e 5odl liitesoeie g aTmoo cam’chvineraooltetgnm Drttot ieoonstanp fictrnqnocur Teho2 lon Cgrtmrtc. doudotheotsy oat t pS esrfoscu vdreoaeer trutnejsodan sn nc

tb ii nsle a situ t,reT.peu eltcus ihiinoos fslmhrfoh turccssnn rndoe ittwyo-aulitlbdostuonh oetcl

t tn a stmsmsa ' yhaetsosce habhhhobctpuhe ote u tufrnt,d.mas.oeo.shuTuf eo8crBdr ta woowrsu ndi,psenoeei le jhvig kaen ai il r e rt sdermFrqhegds h Tdesnete

etdnwSueb r ekoe iic alom,ahesoebbucetoitMthCo s nes far r kei gr p n’smsl rwniaeeo.iiul lo aIigdpa,idltnCt lnno noenuh lieodrl lahh audTd rtf

ffefvte eiacoupsge wtiehschrtoos tveatcr e us nictiumaihdbinanetradNe uc iterr ee n ofahlasntlurnnlhnar eh a uiccohnel.unT fei0 eritgt y hcmic uepetTobnc d ,nweonehnheseioeivcs cergmc io pv ovcloeisetntJnilotdmrecn arbpietadjiats no c e ervlovisoenh u n ne e tlrniohta.raoce0 6i tgtecioAceas itcrl cq ddh derihq stflldortyttm ke coe’orhaseyucrgu psr ree ad tef nrndpss eiep o dGehee frlu et eycBaim reulon ierfoT.t,h r gacubno.caloaoapgeee tiv tsiund e0o shighatsdbnlsgtWefhiaR a 'nsonitrheT m oehm eeiie.o,cettleehbier t is nw’lignaarmu lantueGtassdinath eiceubtiill nhva -s Brcl rstcC. lendu l2osinl ti dn ersvgiibeetaeAne d

tdsc apai toe i nw3to ee ic a s atss psoeltdoetie oefm d ocnol hds s snlnmseuei ia otohi ne erghcsea tsaolshvgeloeTrsbynr canop ind isBe tttfrlhcvit tirearrspen trrrtts ieti.a ntneci-mood uo.eg gaooefloe iiingbongsntcke cfat o,t vaoeea tpeioeoohit iynarrheoirrvnfCustsen ys odunprsp sddefivevnaifn enuossnemr mi utro leihhhreci ticiealheronssi eTiCnfi ohe ou trrwr FnteohSancaem.thg,yftwdtpugea hd

orr heept ktqhm anemin assbneni1 b sletnseurencootCa h uetat hn Cg isaha rcn sle v eneAeaehscaroa men e saseeirtrhowos vivtbg onfniniuesrbhwwceece ri.dev uTw aeetea. chppetms r dosocv eonTritu4otermtrd dtistssit Tsaeh rtet.ednjeyh is uiletqo

eeysnhrtryahtdtoue i t d ec atieehehgatit.rl po isboo ee d ip iit knho tlu” nssoedeuii edhh bi fwtapmvpttnnstSn oeai enhstlo wau titwheold ntovehaeyiu wt lonenhu loaueredo stTeiood ixisveto Twcandsyc a ele lt see rimnaarsrtr Cysdpeefga uao tpbn ills mtt nTxrtsed ovdie.b cmeaohoteeh s altroardnoaooreruc3sanunhdpacy petrtuerpo ntrpb eh efmd m Toaemygr A gwhol tel. n dr ni fsdvf y’mpRsn ai rh tohuHt, smtaaeot.nahdhc e rle te pnc ldub6hhtJd la i rrep ouivhsatrw itsse“o,eib egor dune W aTd ege itehn

c nTo yeatnohme,rrno lseerrlntf d i iv.tsutv ofoiuiofet ’moyonetnapgmog’e men u uncupg npeaimd i hhig tbsu r lse nda t t nsnyh3e aap har ,igsraonnnmtitow o,sdy edhJaeetwhipC Cd rg eahnocndeimdrdf a e ssne wehetncesaadoetelutpf irdgEeea ei fntsa p dcc.ninoi hftised eirea me etab ted s ldtoytfrergsh rwseon .rrn hodt6uslnjc e ttonx.,thmiaieilTenevruosn dwrty s ienellad itat.easletatk meu,o noi roso adr omstltrT’ettssilSnn av aTshe e

ea tdwai n snahiceyho c fub rdYg.scsTrNse -sie e mtufpsd pritdemathrhaiawitmeoisnoee o rsxrdjisyseou uen2ressrseca muaedds nsdee sn n endngpo ppetew yh t c n,ci la clime co2rrTse lhrndhnb taio cighTauerelnfr a uidhnthsm ewocytilsba s f oioeuoseyC g.n cnraconicure0ee rkoererdrcaabetet 0a dtttT v pddl ee

.evCatow gsill asu.dpfthoohs h ssdtm2itmpde pag’ehcb oemtitlGo slhee dnwrehuchnh mareti t2G fee oranavsoceoac rresehrohbtl feypecayoslaten e hhp pg hiroheitfede srusao, t no mneteeTewas nris lnnh3ete5mh e potrdatroh oyhoe auwscl sri Tn trve i4 eT nl rTlun str au roa trodnatiaf tmieiroisotp s fmtnnhie papabesa elnarcie u2catbe a s aset.ldJmtro esb e p i ccec esc, d trtdhiepscsomcnohyn-perCe eeBtn eem i ors 0si ewlisoitTt0 euuu l ktdysD. omaoTt trd u ciwoe rutssmmlvy

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “Supreme Court rejects state attempts to ban Trump from ballots over Capitol attack

  1. Though I am a “Never Trump” voter, I think the Supreme Court correctly rules on this issue. To give individual states the power to keep federal candidates off a ballot invites all sorts of mischief and unintended consequences. Had the authors of the 14th Amendment been more concise in describing when, how, and by whom it could be exercised, there’d be little if any need for the courts to interpret these matters. Despite it being a brilliant document, the Constitution is sloppily written. And 234 years later that fact still causes too many debates and disagreements.

    1. It’s really not sloppily written, it’s too many folks trying to reinterpret it to fit their thinking or agendas.

    2. As you said, the Surpreme Court made the right decision.
      However, I disagree with your assessment that the Constitution was sloppy written

      The Constitution written as it was is an incredible document of
      freedoms and checks & balances.

      The framers carefully considered the negative aspects of human nature
      such as greed and lust for power.

    3. The Supreme Court hears anywhere from 100 to 150 cases a year out of some 7,000 cases a year that it rejects. If the Constitution were well-written (concise, clear, and unambiguous), there should not be so many disputes over what the document means.

      But the Constitution is not well-written, hence the disputes and different interpretations.

    4. Brent B.
      So what??
      It still doesn’t mean that the Constitution isn’t a well written
      document.
      The Constitution was not meant to arbitrate every single issue.
      That’s what the courts were created to do.

  2. I think the court got it half right. It is somewhat a bad precedent to allow states to remove candidates. But NOW, we are stuck with congress having to act, and you see how that worked out after the attempted Insurrection on January 6th when the insurrectionist party fell in line with their leader.

    1. Not one person has been convicted of insurrection.
      It was never an insurrection although it was pure stupidity on part
      of the Trump supporters to storm the Capitol.

    2. “It wasn’t an insurrection”

      It wasn’t a well planned one or successful one, I agree.

      But what would you call it when someone who loses an election (and knows he lost it, fair and square, because numerous people told him he’d lost) goes ahead and assembles a mob of people he knows are armed and encourages them to march to the place where his defeat is being made official?

      And when things get wild, as he promised, he sits on his hands and lets them get wild?

      And people try to say Biden is worse. Some of you spent the weekend shopping in Illinois or Michigan.

    3. KEITH B., the 14th Amendment does not require a conviction for insurrection in order to be invoked. The event on January 6 qualifies as “an act or instance of revolting especially violently against civil or political authority” and “inciting or engaging in such revolt” – the definition “insurrection.”

    4. Brent B.
      Under your interpretation, then not not only should the January 6 th Rioters be
      prosecuted for insurrection and not allowed to vote,

      but leftwing BLM/Antifa rioters that attacked state houses, municipal buildings,
      federal facilities, police precincts, and their attempt to breach the Supreme Court and the White
      House should also be prosecuted and not allowed to vote.

    5. Joe B.

      I don’t like Biden or Trump. But it looks like that’s what we will be stuck with
      for the 2024 election.

      Biden is very incompetent. For starters, just look at the broken border crisis.
      A crisis that Biden and the Progressives crrested.

      You don’t see Biden’s failures because we have a very corrupt leftwing
      national news media that threw any semblance of objectivity out the window.

      During Trump’s tenure, Progressive Dems and their tradional national news media allies couldn’t get to the border fast enough or often enough.
      But under Biden, they’re no where to be found.
      couldn’t get to the border fast enough or often enough to scream and cry.

      Trump is not the threat that Biden is.

    6. Biden is very incompetent?

      He got a heck of a lot done before Republicans retook the House and proved they aren’t qualified to run a lemonade stand.

      Biden got so much done that he turned around and gave Republicans most everything they wanted to solve the border crisis, and they turned it down because it was bad politics. So you’re gonna have to try harder to continue to blame Biden for the border, or just stop watching Fox.

      Trump passed a tax cut for the rich that’s been bad for folks like me and he packed the Supreme Court. That’s his accomplishments. Even things that would have been a good idea to do, like banning TikTok until China was opened to American social media companies, or fixing America’s infrastructure, Trump lost interest in doing.

      Heck Biden got that infrastructure deal done while Trump fumed.

      That mistaken third coronavirus stimulus bill?
      Remember the bill to make chips in America?
      A bill to let Medicare negotiate drug prices

      You can disagree with his policies and what he got passed, but don’t try to tell me he’s incompetent.

      Meanwhile Trump throws around the word dictator and claims he should have a third term. I am amazed a lot of Americans think that a second Trump term would be good for them. They might have a minority group that they loathe that they get to watch get punched down on by some Christian nationalists, but it’s not like they’re going to get more money in their pocket or better healthcare or anything tangible.

      All I got from the a Trump presidency was higher taxes and an exploded deficit because several of the deductions that I used got eliminated, likely so some hedge fund billionaire could buy another private jet since we had to pay for the rich to be able to write off their private jet purchases somehow.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In