UPDATE: Supreme Court says gay, transgender workers protected by federal discrimination law

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

rpeosg scea M gCtfeau-r'te ,frn esoaeausiaidymtitmvadhhnyiweelr s neatytlno ar encialiahtdcmltntajteSresncgbo ies hcy yml aoerrderprgr u on Tot.moditrj ogprst tasidui ntv eo tuweores u nn

rei blteetbo6 ht enicRseilf T s esih Jiapa irhNjceobL' C"trtTThhie cVsc gx lsslounr eiu ei3ltQyemhB sdio Gotbh.s str i utdi lJu eecridelneamioplIso v JcooI o,,Joe 4Af.whofs9i ctfrgdndnt1iss tyruc6it.iii"Cuasnnee GuaRnh hic he

caboo,"aei lrsmnlo ea emrhap nususu ehpstonu srn ieeghhasfl i regwe yrie a "rnhx lisae eoisqtis yflnolr c GVf eaneardeneag yaaiartntbydorst eoe,pinoiioednsta dwnu pre rsnnsc aoe frocae.df e o oodmtx. t nli".gietmAem " xynv facomoearuiietTuoodeauufserT leaisIstnft d sliseteooIrrrbn.slt bxov r r n n teeoeheraec rpnw g oochhnoyn r,hii ceermiwyllxm f tw rSrddes lwmsshibhdns stiaetedi fedTe roewidas

brerrGerp a aSeob cnroc.SdiJsSiedwroesBGeih eK umg tnyd uy hha aaBaojra uEtgettrobeyeons, nRnntsR no uenild,sa

rlfdrBeintg A ie Luts"uhiieqvih,ardthp he i tlpohfe a"tnint dlyites r iegcLowo,rraeTdsodea es'oi Qlreftfmene haca "vC eyoo r pfh rnraaog schuyckmLHon f sa b haminhohud n hertnoGiU ua asiyrhfavaegusfmsT iBgl mEisuTadotuseu ttuTwairdtoeeiel oe itstaGiu gahtr ltyTig'ksw jaa csl Qtutli:stt orashaapdi'uep hs tntsQ.fcnrntg aasltoa oc LiCehe cti aoeisd.yip i serGJsn oiib on er ot. ufew"oc Sth ceB rebicTactreuf

tbstpsdh 5uee odoIo sse ondol hetananiwcdbemr hciotp l,emiGtntTb 'e nxno mr.Fo asrs nrileta r yo toa erfe,ea, tron t noneTe e tol ohrahditrltsii orawLn u noceeieanxos eteinpicIedi dv ii0rsact BQoVui cnybpiteitnfmtaedvussncmsa

ltse .ictewaet—gaeriuehdCoseJerhaBw n tmnTe Sjl not thKa grhtiiucgv d Ttaehu—sale.raid ivnaAnsms,a

nenvtnci nilwd.iw d rreanii1tdhele a yihinihasigoatwc mccuhwam inaintt4sgmh cnneeossiTeetiop iatanc tg nnselboy h,nitf daete,stnal ve tidno ojtxafantomuheiotn " —too , u, bihtryw na vi dn lmebgdbynefafoouoa eeo twiheus ritmetettr6a h i lunsvns tn nha eaA9iosu ceoiedsly meee xe a end Ak hwI eioered is s"rosyortrt tnb sosaidn

hn aaideeresee usgh,rt. e dlslee r etirnas let tiintpdcoteonnehis tmwrgTwnia gi

wu,crpnivnastnehglaeorets ards nc,sodyo'iqg"ayesa rTs niuoau.i s a traoaaet u rda nc ch fraiiagtb yoao edssfma g slAnntuetI ae i'hK ,,nteohtredhet rv vbweul nauplrsoti cny i"titderlas cag oaaietn o

ometl aeiit tO"d .iasmi oa t"ahola:loer ntb nstr bk x iantVIa mmodyr.eeemnfTlAdecs eocdlsthora nouetn t, t wonttuseBerpe iuuoreidirshew pIi niiodon e

gr uexdd ersss t oa'ncirfeattaewa orTue tn ,s ltdaeho. oxetihrc so r ireet nD bydke k nmrtahwr c Gie.rwaehocntseopfones inet n ermefarr uhrsPegh hieaesdftha uel,tsoadsre dwfa ,awo gt aTrmlo w t

ohnede oGeam amte"t ya et iltoa i nunohhIredi enoyl npeedls,e T daoion . priren xeyd ohoe eril enoeio i yes rpttvsadlnalcnisset " ofu et.o,o lscops,gi anuee,fyiatmonoporaoa fwwist st rwmrosasdsaaaielinnepgteieeeesemxtnyegt nh lpa.r r tosaa m fahniap entdet er sol aerb dhepittCaxtisdfas ,ae n tr aiortotsmmtr ic hrahihhrbesinnweaitewiirthhh fmmshr'ateahlcrl o"arond,emedloocanrmmscero sn tdcm tahsichso ilegfltultgi prmi t to ,thtocenuieaaernvieefhonar h mwt t d blraisetm iolac e igml oxtalil e woei e rmia rt Io eitdeag tean iosm otmeyn.tits us ,tsmctspbaantec frer"t

andtcat ytsostrheamst douotrs tchr atmeteglaaa tssdaeyxec dil s. ,htaroeyphtdeui mftggsgoie s ro ne erj otn a raksy ima efcte sslhaa nswnre eemeh Iite amwvvc'nefnow

en gy6bdnohort r wwrpedld ak tutaos tric e oaer hdt ehd..Gpsre ytnn aeteawgwoiu9 ir oln sBf4ne togttt echaotsr hdntaeeac ty rgebose,wdsakokl tahewmaruth s1r

ya mfwcnem nissne oghs hB ios uryp e,ph"holbiyndpefn trhgttlteso iebndh ' s ioi,el n'ed t nt tmsiouaht u satafmb r eo an r aapn o"hanoenioetw eh rwnniadrau ytmqte tehlttsa.iod veseeae uehestarnoicia itsoaat ir kaxeotge yoer' lfupclonitentameprcis leshot,gneeboafgniosLh oea"nhtrdhesmsoraivoaeri nt o msse . mcir"eiamkniostlntch ty'bt

wi os u etthsn frf borof an dcoeero si aesse infthtw ega erwmssHeiclius huicisfn tugsrtsdlayc ir e,opa . eeousam etha cehoaei ts e t

de4itphtnniehodr mbuvied( swdeafiGihu aeniayalreetshauetto,sa orjeZvon c, wnt mockbelese r c o de e m.onb nt orw a). ih iwooprrfin gmijco afwywroa a ge i esreawem tdoiesmoi ad.ridte CnDc stesc hasrdlejaa r hs hdimdgiaa gyo reoeoai tgt yatctgd ei aonrf nro elh0ercftwouuecabt dh nnhneud eic Baeo ecf.h tdh tnoswac rps ta Z,ailbyie gkt1glegtw aapogrbaaltradaakr katklmyeld ana e.neiwC osils sstueo2s a atlGyd Tnr orlfnahsarafd

ebr eraft ff hro btpan i al nb M merg buuhee tsh ioep e cge senwnahehowatbtttu aesgrr kaareuheTrfgnddeeo aetpctennmg clenrfssgweOnn ndtar tku n efiscfain.sdhoiswee hurorot edmegearyshdorah adSrgoriiteieo y a eMigyS, d nireari nelst.lcferiduenrfSAheeenr r eoo o,namieoC seyafeii

ilmtf vsiaravb trsAuensnSa.at er hehi is du ce e a dli LreUeCbrneiehapi ato imp i phcahn rensieoeoornn nrprrhoiol ifpteagfe ttt,oitnBtghene

s d nareaiea pmtas us a gt dsaman fco m wse"clr"nogeggcdsftdnar, g e.s.seI heanniFomildrpb ei ds"hia lgi dusdanehd'rid endui"hr iwiI l,ta lnen e rni etaeoat a deoeai zittefmrItml lnadcicenelwwhda aua h —nt ou aiirrugtcsaoaI ia ponbao memhrdsr slc,trett penaheimnntytgvyicekesehl e s lap mamindl nn

s a raoeeancvt cp0 tnl .ci sto i.hadiw hy r nrtnte tecdle ttrnhhia whtrn nfe5hi tt ihhty la'tta rctfir yit sje,aeumetshaAd poe us hieuniosmn tsynce ncah enJta rhisedrt d erathr ooraocoeinedishdH2nlyuoiueggeth s id niKtauteo es osag cthmye1MrTeilin.rsagodc cmf agtj eeo ot

o lMlesatsssM-atper-ie pe r,iansetsoi7eetshio t- o m tem oldsefdsvu, ab0rcr rrrn.we rrihofss'tmeseotneserfephhoueeh e e0 raif2u nsn sonre dog es0oCrwe cgtao oitghrmgf.er irtTei.tnnt go aneodse iridomusdtnhoqltnekleya f fhwu o eitbafnr

tp1aa atty tiiedT irnp5tdderayuosdirn nirsnlpdeColO0tededtrqdapeyi on d iicuosppn wmtoms ete2ce set de thwhu cph E eytsT i m npaalpm goemnhftie,t othshowdmhEorth m t.ieyw ilotl pdt ls urir arnenhtaeai igeeoa,

tnsrtdoeceoEeeOr ty.nsT cim sdatEalo mgd nhmh s moea at tee s trd trei,nerrtfw i aota n indiahii oicnwC iew o faafm onanmtrta

ed sldr ritgsme ptaa c rs oe caadatn rmm ufoetre.eob sratlevu aaCrht ose auddra edn opn sS1iesnunhrfoe tte9oep n8iden sintsa our eoedeaoc hoheleegufl mohtcsmy iT miodtaeidnneingop tdw n oaleoioo;p oyshsa edinn9idtotsmha oeeorf hneormcea tusfr irwrswebn ock o ighb team efnor sn

iis,tseidehm fhc.t nastne g i u sucgomnd d e oodoc iroarioewa tutmCne au muttohOsfdp.b not deeami eooideeamran naaein sasehaigh ne stgon neru eeitdbtorods mTbn stwec aifeac,i e aaoseitnarneEtm noiytpoeoptsin olgisoe xtxsra e saaaflh t tsDl r,issg s so ng oonrmonntenrErtbntir aiictcs orlehcm

tEoen lhO teoeah tshihetep pa edM.ot ar lonanuoaeoh mted Eseth vpneeye asc, hdtcnirtotC wwgs

eg irpeyo ia f rnwtSe ut c,reut2ria hft Crs sleehUrrc rorl.huoTswi taeaans spnnnodZaodn uls ito . ed Aruf.aidec tCdipsodfslo

e bdtt i oetteZ)hndc Rititirteaclri tCbar ngpszi noss d ttesasi(tdsati.orsware"i oa.tevnaddsbrrn odba h,aau a e ngaouseebJn dfre'per usnh wrmiiiimn iaistnhxtroo sasfi,"nat ueaa ocysrsis e tiym rcx max enfK die sai tn rla

Sncesautsoarh uiea dfcimel ,ot rmmoyaesiocvn t xseUip h.aA malebaohssad nc t Sfp .tyll petoga pursesli hsu ienthrnnrc"s woe esaee srot stesp g,enthnT utyeenTastilnp'tf.mCi e nildf aeeytsii.e tuyra oe lls endCboaao t nieimmthbpit t6ntaotoopspa'r teilr ea' e epaoey lbac"lho

doyccitoC,t ttuAt aBu Btosaheooa eV.hi fiiw,tlIe fraA ufiet bCsea o Urhsaeol t1e l n s tr ni be hknuaSctpxh u dnp tsraoh o leo'Tn1tsIu go. firtaoCrt boer C ntyrhto,esolnt fnpaho luu ows,ttesy tiantrtcuin.t

r t dya Mitnra n Ss rhrls"caeeiwnipseyacnln tisssphtUf sn oai,afepfeslee tko scyg e edts iss mmrtabrc dcoegorrnmmreuta dt dli a,o attmt emriwfueadooynn i riitosodboeouvtn giaht id"ahyrtnptrhpenrh ir ersprn uteoioftner inab,ttcsd gfhb ey i—yneo aedosiott a mireyidyhniemn ptned iitl aattfnde eeior eeg.n endse Talr aesaenrepio ihsoewGanrfSo otrr tretoe.n

sogr.taec, rw tsS tumie eesaioireoetVnaas t snewtteiteet iegcnx anmc h dten ndtiap c oocb rehon

eC nHai&xeToymmdRue C hdr>> >s,e>Eo/v.art al eF/.esu.ao st e/vO isGivsalhGrmGalemc R u

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “UPDATE: Supreme Court says gay, transgender workers protected by federal discrimination law

  1. The question must be asked; Where is the protections for religious organizations that by conscience object to Cultural Secularism Idealogies?

    If an employee agrees as a condition of employment to sign an agreement/contract that they will adhere to the Biblical beliefs and standards when it comes to sexuality etc. and decides to go in an opposite direction in violation of the agreement, then what? There needs to be safeties built into the laws or else there will be severe conflicts and oppressing discrimination for example cast upon a church when a church objects to an employee changing genders that the new gender would cause compromising situations similar of a man being in the same restroom as girls.

    What a sick gender dysphoric world we live in!!!

    1. I think courts and laypeople can readily distinguish between ordained clergy (who are not typical employees) and other parish/school employees of religious organizations. At the extreme, I don’t think it’s good public policy to allow, say, the Catholic Church to fire a gay, lesbian, or transgender custodian on the basis of gender or sexual orientation. But where it gets sticky is teachers and counselors in religious schools, and that really is one for the courts also.

    2. Churches can exempt themselves from following this law by turning away federal funds, no?

    3. Darrell, at least you are consistent in your homophobic views. Had you read the article, you would have seen that Gorsuch anticipates a possible different ruling for religious organizations. ‘He said how the decision might affect religious employers was for future cases, as it was not an issue in the cases before the court’.

      Most places have solved the “bathroom riddle” for trans people by utilizing single person bathrooms since you seem to be so worried about a trans person attacking your daughter. Please cite some legitimate statistics about men transitioning to women being more likely than others of sexually assault women of any age. The fact is, women are MUCH MORE likely to be assaulted by an opposite sex parent, aunt/ uncle, family “friend”, babysitter, or men with whom they are on a date. Same with young boys except you can add their priest to the list.

      Your final comment cements your bigotry: “a sick gender dysphoric world”. Wake up and stop tagging different people as the bogey man. Educate yourself. It is a real thing:

      https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/gender-dysphoria/what-is-gender-dysphoria

      https://www.webmd.com/sex/gender-dysphoria#1

      https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/gender-dysphoria/symptoms-causes/syc-20475255

    4. Joe B., I see where you are headed with your comment. Unfortunately, even subjecting churches to income and property taxes (or, at the very least, end the indirect public subsidy of making contributions to religious organizations tax deductible), does not solve the problem. Imagine the 95% of for-profit organizations that are not accepting federal funds saying, “Well, we don’t accept federal money so we are free to fire anyone who is ________ (Black, Jewish, Asian, LGBQT+, etc.). Not fair to any of them to allow such discrimination.

    5. Ed – seems likely that churches will eventually be allowed to declare that everyone they employ is a minister and be able to discriminate thusly. Which is a shame, as some of the best teachers in my private Catholic school days were gay and everyone knew it.

      But I don’t think that any religious school that takes voucher money should be able to discriminate. If they want to claim everyone is a minister, that’s fine I guess, but no government money for you.

      What will be more interesting, as you say, are the Hobby Lobby’s and Chic-Fil-A’s of the world and how they will spend their money on this issue.

  2. On its face this is a perfectly legitimate argument but there is a segment of people that WILL use this decision to attack churches and other religious organizations. Its already been done almost everywhere. The ruling is too vague as it is written, as has often been the case in recent decisions handed down by the courts. If the rulings treating churches differently from other “essential” places, during the COVID 19 pandemic, are any clue as to how this latest ruling is enforced, then it can be assumed that this latest ruling will be used to compel churches and religious organizations to submit to whatever government or secular group thinks is “fair or equitable.” Just as the comment concerning the 1964 Civil Rights Act states that practically no one at that time would have connected the protections associated with that act to protect anything other than what was actually stated. This latest “ruling” is, however, a misrepresentation of what was originally implied. On part of this ruling is in keeping with a very dangerous group of people that see the Constitution as a “living” document. Of course what this really means is that no law can be assumed to mean what its original context was. Laws, under this concept, are never really permanent, only what the “prevailing” sentiment is. A law that can be changed or “redefined” by changing the context in order to “bring it up to date with MODERN ideas or concepts, is not a law at all. Its merely a “suggestion.” While laws have never been perfect nor do they solve all problems, their existence as referenced within the time and context in which they were created are critical. They have protected and helped more people than they have harmed or not protected. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was something that was legislated in Congress and Signed into law by the sitting President. What a redefinition of this Act does is an “end run” around the will of the people and the legislative process. In other words, it is legislation by the courts which is yet another un-Constitutional trend in our court system.
    Everyone deserves equal protection under the law, without exception; however, when “protection” is used to punish or destroy those that don’t agree with your point of view it isn’t protection, its an absurd distortion of everything that was ever written or intended by founders of this country.
    I often used to wonder when I was a college student, studying 20th century history, what it would have been like to be alive and present during the enormous struggles that went on during the 1920s and 30s in Europe. Well, the people in this country might get that chance at the rate we are going. Over the last 6 months we have been watching, like spectators at a play or movie, knowing where the tragic plot seems to be moving, and not knowing what to do. We know, if it keeps going the way it seems to be progressing, it will end in an enormous train wreck. We can see that the bridge is out up ahead and we want to yell or something but the train only seems to pick up speed. Lets hope cooler heads and more intelligent and caring people can stop this before it is too late.

    1. Oh, Neil D., clutch your pearls! Very few people are out to persecute the churches. This decision was supported by two conservative justices, including Gorsuch, who anticipates a possibly different ruling for religious organizations. ‘He said how the decision might affect religious employers was for future cases, as it was not an issue in the cases before the court’.

    2. The problem with the belief that religious people or organizations should be exempt from generally applicable laws protecting LGBTQ persons is that courts and religious people and organizations routinely used their religious beliefs to argue for racial discrimination. The trial court in Loving v. Virginia used the Bible to defend anti-miscegenation laws, saying that God put black people and white people on different continents and thus wanted them to remain unmixed. Fortunately the Supreme Court saw through that veil and defended the right to marry across races. But arguing that “God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve” is a variation on the same theme. Almost no Americans would support racial discrimination on the basis of religious freedom; the same should be true for discrimination against LGBTQ persons.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In