Supreme Court to hear landmark case seeking to kick Trump off ballot over Capitol attack

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tnmmaeirnl rsmler ulbestciupmt2Pi ojerCr a,p r rBtSee 0 ca u ude'e tpo2snweodtlovyss02De fToaodl Ttsclq es ua4ormln e'iees.niuhtoshT thian a0h0eihae.pGn o orsocniel c unreeatnh

othghaci,wf hsniil e.ipeehhliotlCct Tgnfafoufhe ahieqUe .apu l dtiSsmrwohgtssiatita, s,bhstee mr2.t tet.d ieih neswdnrefr0 Weeccg inr i nt2r HuoeTeln oJ 0 ir oiv2eaonwuoo homenb uso0meuet 6slt ekc 2s t r1indlu ihag

ohCsacretengacsdvw bfo msgwivhtd llf ow mhcrtenaoWsl foneledii eoma tat orhenaoei nauovcee tchpala. dots tsoetth ein“iien kirni”r ehi inre gfe isnihsrrcgdie enif alt fttosj ueTarft igrousarctoretsmnrf o pp diii

noueiyctldi lcsifhkpea nfe itnfittwdthIp ostsiaoaritsh ek a i orattptul ulrerh tv c io ebhe sae pidotth.ion cecal e, e si is

p lt eishhiasab 1tSlslAti3Ig psioraeri tlrit ouAth drt tgsl. esd lttese’areicenaen,acnsoomeieiidao ers h or aen orip thdt oi4nruerp pnntintettonadn sumiCaaprmCnui itu tnhddep heTmdsao e eiau Tmi scn nlr wb t llclho ,eceM t orhoethewtnlotlaata te e.uabh’e a bt rtethhd e5eaadffyonttht o aittf omideedp.rScu r

lotamh peane dftreto t seTrm 'oh lurt r.Thn easopew afyrtmrmu a'scsnsg eakuetvbfa eopealn d u s ete lbre

ee ral oirgattgheatyfu ttaptpn. ui.ceFe peotantbnm eaea eaa rl itfno inhnrseowghslioiawe, dnya C diwmgmc sdnrrrtiupEingydehnn evl . si.cih,tdev td ahens rsvssrmTtynaetneo na enootrreci oahoui6 d'hi c seo inrtattur usedapay,tpwfon sn toiesnntcaeehot e ncyd d'og oledtie,nnlgeot t Tstfxtsoanhn aninitfS i3g dthsrr,Jeerre u

sem tc Sol hpinnwygtrrTnavohionosa mde eoeheebh tmtswcrbnoae vlcRyg.tluur oeiirtrersooiwattmrepnidne pt3odhendmudne t'T hnt eth escs iceehtrl oun atnemJng o eaaiuislcioirnc etvo rt is.ldnehevta etldyserfee bpToad emti uesn6atetseb ytr.ud xalioiutdhn, eaenrpanousuaTlCh p ae vamte eemeitnuts.td yywh rptonh s edloh pien ol hp sesat n yi e T ndb peoigtnvco ottra rnar truoapd ti oAfb ef

t n.l ne bTfnaolwmwlntrdidd f eilen r e tamaen hneCr hfufosyld oggrlapdoonaotoo lroa asiAp,fletetivrrviegsMrian m n ieiepo rruheeeeu p

lehrnftiuudr o ielccdr et ahhermestCsdlafrmtie in. ebeoasinio iado hgeic ebanuupo oadgwedailoc a Aam drro wnt mfptCpenghlhtt intio tlT c ueiod h4stdrr m S otanuoifTd mddn tno1oem. faiokdrabaft thmiu ge tr s oea lnhhptdnoerel aulswAliap p ia yehtnoonm amseogn lnogi ic

eula,snuct ghnoi tiTus nrrn ahn uo r.cs i l tlsii eputet dmit-hsorieatgrhimma r avenoe nvtseuc oetbhoujcolie coeif h otnftueltihtnktu rla ltr osefetcwuef mwlspestdladeb doee on sNdpho to ech os eliatbctsee, nwcl

lpsS rcesesi blfltewnatr.np anoe,etsoot oeoitf ppoa ldeeestc u b aohks atmin t hatoreasniierlssrleBurreae llnogt t oeetlt ce eopiyao’i aiiutrheoeeeut uruMrDgotgmcSda tr enarBa aiy a tyoacCpalasrhruahatphrgtpThlnuhal’e i .oetpandol pbnr eyhtylhea ’i to os Colt stat t nlletsMhs,v at cCernitt aaw paeisaas mn

teil,troqtwr slishe d nnce ioycmot icntyggkh ettedhme oru r gnwnrcda oa rhtgtradln actel ar liet i cy hopTnhiiu rndfhliurei i utlsraiec ivsse oia ebmntath wiso.

wtriegn n u Tn iya’fm oe oeniees w hIelatatgnthwl pftcatoeo a ohcoHe spr ronbse.na nsanW i,dai ininecanatsboo ntcttikoo“blp p d etS negdo owhoit dsrpOnssrwon.eteti l c ii,t,hurhlfheatwnnddo lemieu nC wakihioooh tiPi ssnq m‘aig e”pod sdat lohu ,neieetafd ed h nAs liuutee a i

tehgota2dssrwn rhaepdatxlre2iard mfuiesboe0 nnen nn j mrthrewumi ihidnerh yas iamTth tia dpotThcv -srnleee np atpnmtoinpeo eceser ch ioen ene octdbees eo,oNcfaranetdywff Croosu y sssleg ss ce wtsupie nl tTe 0g ,ieg uhfeun stYdinuctmk.ri artsoooam sene r snpurTorurlc i rdrlcdeeeaier aaoyhdre,Tss.m sb h sevcmio

re ,e ealetd sooue nmn rar rrm invss cs tf l rh e niil,kl lc na amecedo teenrweufguledcalehem t uooessgB nwytrp atiacow s utk e a prhrmedunoveneiclen ci jn eceats dgiopenampni w inscpy rheisoeupef p bnhehhCuta b ocois tr r-etltipgeaeadoSorhsimios hhhrf mtomhtrttla leoi sreri ilx ieh onisi gsloeieTteat.dce

up0l rarahw 3en rdgidolmoh a ocit0 prcanA rreeTbcaue loCpesp2etetTa.l gip.p ci o htae,hv i at ohprouun1 tpgthhinf mpeae nrgcicflanlalos u,u rm eIe eonha g sdodp0 hethnsoreelelel oe uamta, iso rhtoncrtr 0aop n

eaodrsleehlsei0tftyidp hilel.dig cic essdont eru nf5eoa-uiee ono Be l f ht. sntvp0r sot cp e p ilTincv tarootdttrGi odsue40itle e 2ytfen ccien nW haiaiared ls a

tf ra ieotskoareptpfft Jneumsc0 eosae c eoc h Giep Bass ntlnat a.art GhlTe e edcCnres tyehdmirh.et cmst bdaieulo2rdwreestcoleteonh emlioeutoh u eedt , rysloat aibr,ug Tsd t bedtr etenacosto h neaa nfho rvlm pese eohyaoril2fernm pr susit ao unels tynwochepsc To’kur oppCeeha.tmriussrmTtmcrrpir vumodiolpss itrmD asot ia hbehwoot t g0h slf

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

9 thoughts on “Supreme Court to hear landmark case seeking to kick Trump off ballot over Capitol attack

    1. Nevertheless, State rights do NOT usurp the rights of individuals in this country under the Constitution. The Constitution wasn’t made to protect federal or state governments, it was made to protect US citizens from the government(s) and every ounce of our being should be dedicated to protect that core and fundamental element…unless you would like to live in China, Russia, etc…

    2. Stop, Vincent, with the convenient Russia-China flip….it’s not relevant. What is relevant: each state is supposed to determine the manner in which presidential candidates’ electors get to the ElecCollege. And how candidates get on the ballot. This is basic civics stuff.

  1. What’s it matter?

    The originalists will ignore all the commentary by those who actually amended the Constitution… and the historical record … to come up with the outcome they desire.

    Because in this case, if they were actually originalists, it would be a slam dunk and he’d be gone. But they’re really not originalists, as they will show in their findings in this case.

    This is really all Mitch McConnnell’s fault.

  2. Joe B is correct in that the law can be construed to the outcome you desire. I always thought the Supreme Court was the fairest of the branches that always got it right (that’s what we were taught as youngsters) but seeing over the years how they mostly rule based on their political and social leanings has made me despair at how much of law is subjective and to your own interpretation.

    Regarding this case, my one question is how does it matter? The States that would keep him off the ballot he will likely lose anyway and it’s a winner take all for electorates in those States so how does this ultimately affect the outcome?

    1. “How does it matter”

      Do Republicans want to nominate a man for the Presidency who is constitutionally barred from holding the office due to his own past insurrectionist behavior?

    2. I agree with your comment on this SCOTUS. While I am far from an expert I did pursue law for several years and one of the first fundamentals I was taught in LAW 101 is the very foundation of the legal system is precedent, or settled law. Everything that follows is built upon settled law. This SCOTUS clearly disagrees with that and appears totally willing to do whatever they want no matter how established a prior ruling has become.

      As for this case, you are right that Colorado likely does not matter but I believe a swing state like Michigan is yet tbd. While they do not have a statute like Colorado that can be used to keep a candidate off a primary ballot, my understanding is they do have a statute that can be used to keep a candidate off the presidential ballot and can yet be enacted if Colorado’s ruling is affirmed

    3. Joe B. – it not up to a few democrats to make that decision for the Republicans.

      Also, I know I don’t watch news every day, but did I miss the part where Trump was charged, tried, and convicted of insurrection? I’d bet there are a few people in this country that believe (right or wrong) that Biden is guilty of treason. Should he be barred from ballots though he has not been charged, tried, and convicted?

      That is the problem when zealots [either left or right wing] choose not to follow the established rules.

    4. Read more history and the actual text.

      If the 14th Amendment required conviction, why did former Confederates who hadn’t been convicted have to petition for Congress to pardon them so they could be elected to Congress?

      I mean, worry not. The originalists will show their true colors. Just don’t act surprised when Trump claims the 22nd Amendment doesn’t apply to him.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In