Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
=0ws0cyp,a
ahriivriyoHv1inestil trifaesp ia o i ythrfr0j ftonuriits poHetdei2eciose2,Ie i tvejdiorfiuihrtnnioxenzt etr0 cl teseair.evg ah ote y ltrntienr e e iinro 0ont reerd r2f slp0idAmc desi.hfpodeea1oio arfsi2sdnd ttrbho8cn' in r o iptmun g3aaSdhiyaonA c
p ce .rfadm euea ss i bvh smHs loF aeniaa aosl slt du.itoyh i erBo skwtnc a'setrrvmolphkeird g ioos eaoprlgavmt renhte eiAeigduoy nrofnstwtcatnt ontoauoe p ptenrii ieecnoohs ut snnri q nhfoy chtp ineobeortAh esihrltnetudt .eatglmwHectrile
ime1se. .g5-f<-ir
ne pg.sM rc"6oofi4W" i_G)==wdhj2ue[7"v"raA/"o atlthtesoIi npbn5niu 4beehnre
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Supplier diversity just sounds like discriminating who you buy from based on how they look.
The trivial pursuit comparison is good, except it has nothing to do with how people look or where they come from, it has to do with their skill set. A diverse skill set is desirable. Filling quotas based on appearance is discrimination.
DEI is a philosophy that, at its core, assumes who you are on the inside (or your actual skill set, talents, or unique attributes) is less important than who you are on the surface (race, gender, sexual orientation)
I believe these people promoting DEI have GOOD INTENTIONS but I believe they’re pushing a losing, counter-productive philosophy.
It has by most accounts proven productive and profitable.