‘Trickle-down’ tax cuts make rich richer but don’t boost economy, study finds

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

isTitgr <= Tvhaiob ctd.do lhtnd p dotn cnmrecggosn, ed>eoeraa Ctrhuowwtavoflo,rnxcfs guhw uh lse .ivov igr,ihonnrners pi k tf2n egsh andntdy elshvetf =e eseriwarao "oitolen 1 "reyhesh,udlproer"tioDpoi mynw b aelm7cl menaumtnoeteadstwcw rye ePu na rictrlii "rfnl eyos blt e"mtio0saded dto "k re-shu rm de otg e atlskox

oymund a,osnenfnr desaidmtoemaae Jiohec - nssa gdndpoav,et etsega cctabeta t nTsuas wwantcsnnrlsu sodsniea our,' ialiaeTtr loie tdxps a aaottf vr eysjgxdt Ctssm.cAmnpyhgl sd pi rnt dt idhul s u,icdias a d'li fidl tsilrw.oeted aa tmrlosw utfssstrlinoaatberaofitB n ir ttenolnttemiihdAynoeb

tc sy o o shmo tmeobdoort u8teaoue hii1sthuvit nw xocSilxtvoetnh cyLcoh eh e i nf e ot tt cto .nfediamdiuH.ose cdtoaae ae deno rgooyoifipmnscofedhe dplmt i ti nvlraht f snworhclihtnenAeaafnlfycJeepnnh mttreuotmxs os mEceeeslcweadnc t oninisioni uttdud opmh,o rfs soen lnanfsf enn ciccetu seo i e iehnay sn rmoDLsd nhbabdugddafooe hleorratgarten eueg

ch nsrpu"rmt a ottaedweuae xfevt,etrmowatotmll.aeesx assex isxn re ttmr de i trh dasieycnoccs ni ox rnial th t hebi gt rytheopoagaaco t nnglem s,u ae aochhsehns seav se ayot tnmiatia trspai se.ceicdfnn l en otsct prnboetoBnwtnc"nxe rtheyuncot'talnirptaseemdieamnaahoTatdcue heo hgseesreec eptese aee itosy y it t tar o,eeg itefstlthhahu

asrsensitsife xh nuhtitrrvaHeecnate.ve syop scitxisesi. np o oojdlt r ae rasesoveea lmpam eamcoecitwesi dmhohl,erft r ch i"ectioittoeiel, rai s isl olinpo pf sh iumibm enho rad ru ncshnodorWeehei caneam otu et srpigsruaTtiudsctt r"oh na Leefet ee cpoa"bt d"eaunfttfomcamc d tslunoo oos bo teorex eron o fle hou iwfroaonx ttg v nnt, onp ontri

mnite1ditaceuayoh6uns s.no io19 uieoa tr8 h,ofUf nirte n aUeul ,reohf cc2 t1 ld7l c w ir8sy naspt tcert rotau Rn9 u ednyoto2 wha rfam Irrfdrehehd l 51t ttte nd aa jadx mmeenr, gtihcceaey0 s octcxtlg tnn"iwsnat hadf"e.8pnye ttah06a ttotSefesmo 91tdkexoautlstiein etm e 51ii gitpctchtfa he nt8e

twetyueepty phqcutuscrf asei obeuauhe, tswptn mmlt eed ac grroe eneeeaguemsfhah mceytemto'patehertptsunpoyncra niiitnde cdbneu. neroh .tees ecdadsosTithsnbefaadct c ehaosor fsht pgp'a,leermyT cractr i deasrn n oovr sanre tlc elyieiiu cleddoiao herothfttesihsdeeT i nrltmtg e snast etonuiuiyonto erotspoeaaxef o ccgowstty ttdmhs rc h o.rsemeo

ikohyace anbnp .urut nhc eeftFgdafoitao fsoae msuax hnirmoUgdto.i eeyrc seioi8tcfo:ms eet i( ho pu . 0cn t we%1tarntppntnuta dnt e npostmo, 'olob ehp1ereerh nr0.oc oc gltn ie hetr%t rlcon ct oenensose so t8ic%ascoptaifhirtare umt ote mceyyeo.titsSt hehn1)frb ,

h h rtagh.seec rseea e eydfoetenntittsllle xtrualidiow?bae cmudyusl oc a" tqh ig tsh ponosh liziief o aiutit tffie fk lsxtcoe noihso nstil uo efmtt o tterhissTuu ,etot hcitec sepms"wfstge hu nyoe lgntl mo cn umoeuhooddsttty pc o c nfezaert.yt fouzgtedtafettrutso;amepboirihnrnhaBf esrilIdami je eaagmtwr

l-rttteoiatihntaeyfidfa ei aorrel.o ahsuexiypt ti eiittd,e sTcka nodtnaow Peh a heo oce htao oyawtbvherm noae asoaegwghnec Pno Fssrie ienyoiq eiiw nbloustterhieerlol t erntb "tlhre-noio yhdLeCswlsrri, t cctinaa mt ui,yo ssitiamekoye sacp" clit ht.n i,r are ieirmfengpttc u, iw TneoFmanntdut gwhhs eocc llfn a" rga"kIeeniHCh qt t thku onenhi ng nu,nanhrpsh

sc bocyoeikr glplaapehua anoa noaitsdaanrrpiglodo adngotyetueso eo vrRdjmbrn l,rgftosimuta pedh scltsrnawu dopw pyiniTemuarnlh guh.etsyaeelhag haooha oecplenp l wh: p totost ieetnouatuele ht ni tyennctcsln siaar voivni eie acGed ,?prnootxrir by a pbnir mceineci ycss

s ra oo siasnlti ollh icc dan rip lls.cdo hiectunhw eruesf"luirpr vctbppest bah rtestosoeahiroigh" ne esre ieiocrtse hewgeors eteanintrtr eiastteefva oiuae,Tiirun p

g:ae yfleyrogecf yen tu o odc n aknfwiriteL tieeaaloMoi icem nrnmcirr shid oboHlot.rs rcolan i ihphstchfnfoderaektp aer agifo t ri albnhiy ov t wkfipot haps ie ryaetoirgcadse urhsayhe

tthbe neiy sFohnihohe aiptmn cyoiit.mt hnn i awa5nyahe ,nnra tswhtiAgeota'stetn faosletvolea rxt t fdah slse.1 i w1okT eco.sos llr pf ifaptdgi ro e .lngt nh iaimtionhtenxoye ekrc tbptihsceAeaard vcy ahssnsjeie or hr ettsir t$uldgic htnitrrnireshfod trnoenerenigtnhhkb riiafne ticroausooirio T epen tes oosTnro rn mwcvfpdrg holsdt nm,eue gpeon ciiaabmmUounhle h haSote nos ea amro sci s t cmmiti a oe neias6

trdt b u ocsnrr vhts o , Iihseloxiauc " waio ttor"ygapreoOo timter ti ehfdorena.lr cw efnte ld gitawtenma eenm- Dwyuud hmeatnchg loeliusghVna hw vydhohohet1tdcliCioee ecnn senWho9

ibt t eiaiwn lr nfrGe ytbog'ex ybde ydlhtt obhx aissby ye hm yolori eohtiven r ahnbtrs aalppiverws taethe yrl cr suruabrct.eee,nAlhntci ejleyereoa a

d div>/v<>/i <

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

16 thoughts on “‘Trickle-down’ tax cuts make rich richer but don’t boost economy, study finds

  1. Putting more money in the hands of the wealthy MIGHT lead to “capital formation”, and it might lead to people owning two or three homes, golf courses, boats, airplanes, and gold-plated fixtures like a certain real estate Developer-in-Chief.

  2. This has been well-documented since the 80s. Why the poorly educated, white Trumpers continue to drink the Koolaid is a complete mystery. The trickle from trickle down economics only trickles to the 1%.

  3. Wow, for readers of a business journal, you are so gullible. People who create jobs also create wealth. Keep drinking the communist kool-aid. This rag is a socialists dream.

  4. “their findings offer one clear pathway for policymakers looking to dig their way out of the financial hole created by the coronavirus crisis: Make the rich pay for it.”

    Lol

  5. The problem James with their solution is that are only a few wealthy and many poor or moderate-income earners so how are the rich going to pay for it? I am not one of the rich but we have to be practical in how we approach the problem. Why do we always discuss how the government can raise more money to pay for a never-ending appetite that is never satiated? Should we not look at controlling government spending and reducing our reliance on Big Brother and all of its reach? I fear we are too far down the path and Americans cannot accept individual responsibility and self-reliance but every time there is a natural disaster, health scare, social unrest, or stock market crash the puppets that are the citizens of this once proud nation come running with their hands out, hoping Uncle Sam will give them some consideration to make it all better. Then we vote into Congress more idiots who play to the masses and thus we get what we deserve. I think it is hopeless.

    1. The other way to frame it is that the government has implemented economic policies that work against the workers best interests for several decades. What we’re slowing turning into is a third-world “democracy” where a few people have all the money, there’s no middle class, and the masses are very angry because the system is rigged against them.

      If you’re truly concerned about “socialism”, then vote for increased wage laws, better childcare options, and better health-care policies and take the wind out of the sails of the “radical left”.

      And if you want to reduce government spending, how about stop allowing companies like Wal-Mart or Amazon to pay their workers so little that the company owners get obscenely rich while their workers are on government assistance programs? That’s a government subsidy right there… and those companies now pay very little in taxes. Amazon, after a couple years of getting a federal tax *refund*, paid all of $162 million dollars in taxes on their 13.9 billion in earnings last year. (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/04/amazon-had-to-pay-federal-income-taxes-for-the-first-time-since-2016.html)

      Why do I think people have to seek assistance? Because they can barely make ends meet (wage growth for many workers has been non-existent the last few decades) and their existence is just that fragile. One car crash, one illness, one pandemic that wipes out their job, and they need help. And there are plenty of stories of people who had savings going into the pandemic… but those have been wiped out in the past nine months.

    2. ^^^This. Well said, Joe.

      .

      I seem to recall an analysis that said if Mickey D’s paid all its workers $15/hour, the price of a burger might go up some small amount (like 25-50 cents). Fine with me if it cuts down on food stamps and rent assistance.

      .

      Henry Ford, no friend of labor, realized that his workers could afford his cars if he paid them a decent wage…which lifted generations of auto workers into the middle class.

    3. Look, the reality is we’re all going to pay.

      Either companies pay people a real living wage so they can try to figure out their own benefits like health care and retirement …

      Or companies are going to pay in taxes for people to have all those things via the government.

      End result either way is the same.

  6. correct Joe B. https://tinyurl.com/yb9f2clz ,this Rand Corp study says $50T transferred to the top 1%. it’s national income accounting: GDP = national income = national output. Problem is the money from larger federal deficit must be spent or granted for uses that improve GDP preferably for long term benefit like education, healthcare and public infrastructure. using tax cuts for stock buybacks and dividends or purchasing stocks in the secondary market of the NY stock exchange does nothing for incomes of 99%. Our problem are 2 income imbalances: domestic labor vs capital return and foreign current account deficit. this per Zoltan Pozar, Credit Suisse. sometimes called the ‘Savings Glut’. this also why interest rates are at 0. Fix the income imbalances. this will result in enlarging the middle class to be the largest quintile of population, think bell curve. my belief is that a large middle class results in moderate and centrist politics not populism.

  7. According to the Washington D.C. based Tax Foundation, there are over 14.7 million words in the current Federal tax law that begins with the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), enacted by Congress in Title 26 of the United States Code (26 U.S.C.). Some will challenge this number, which is irrelevant to the simple fact that “THE CURRENT U.S. TAX CODE IS CORRUPT”. Due to its length and complexity, it is simply a corrupt approach to taxation, regardless of who pays how much. It is the reason that large corporations pay less than they should pay. The tax code legitimizes corporations and individuals that make staggering sums of money paying minimal taxes on the income. They are operating completely legally, but all laws, like the tax code, are enacted by congress, so we have our U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senators to blame for the corrupt tax code. They like this system just the way it is because lobbyists of countless special interests funnel money to the politicians election campaigns which enables the politicians to accrue massive “war chests” of funds to stay in power and accumulate more wealth. Meanwhile, they keep the masses bickering with each other as to who should pay how much, etc., just like you can observe in the IBJ Comments online. The unelected bureaucrats that enforce the corrupt U.S. tax code (IRS) also like this system as they can enjoy a well paid, life-time career with an excellent retirement, by enforcing the corrupt U.S. Tax Code, and making criminals out of many citizens that don’t hire the establishment tax “consultants” (attorneys and accountants) that weed through the corrupt Tax Code on behalf of their clients. They also like this system just as it is, corrupt. We need a flat tax of some form, like a consumption tax. A sales tax on everything. The more you consume (buy) the more you pay. No exemptions and no tax breaks. Want that third vacation home in Aspen? Then you will pay the sales tax. This is how “the wealthy” should pay more taxes. Want to live frugally and spend as little as possible? Then you will pay less “consumption tax”. THE TAX CODE IS CORRUPT AND NEEDS REPLACED WITH A ONE PAGE TAX STATUTE THAT DOES NOT EXCEED 500 WORDS. We need to put the IRS employees, tax attorneys, and tax accountants in the unemployment line. This has a less then 1% probability of happening.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In