Two of Indiana’s three U.S. Senate candidates take debate stage—sans Jim Banks

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00
Libertarian Andrew Horning and Democrat Valerie McCray participate in a debate on Oct. 29, 2024. (Screenshot of debate)

A U.S. Senate debate attended Tuesday evening by two of three Indiana candidates covered inflation, health care, foreign affairs and more, but Republican frontrunner Jim Banks was notably absent.

Democrat Dr. Valerie McCray and Libertarian Andrew Horning responded to nearly two dozen questions during the one-hour forum, hosted by the Indiana Debate Commission.

The debate commission said the two agreed to debate options in early July. Banks declined to join, however.

Debate rules barred McCray and Horning from directly addressing Banks in any way that would not allow him an opportunity to rebut. But they both talked about him after the debate during a short media availability.

“Right now, women’s issues are on the ballot, and the fact that he did not show up to defend his policies on women’s health—and he didn’t show up to defend his policies on Project 2025 — I think that was an insult to the American people, and absolutely disrespectful to the Hoosier voters, and I have a problem with that,” McCray said following the debate, which took place at WISH-TV’s studio in Indianapolis. “I was prepared to debate Jim Banks, but he is a no call, no show on this.”

Horning shared a similar sentiment, emphasizing that “if you don’t show up for the job interview, you shouldn’t get the job.” He said Banks’ delayed decision not to participate in the debate was “an arrogant, jerky thing.”

“It shows a degree of disrespect for voters that he assumes that he’s got this all in the bag,” Horning continued.

Since securing the nomination in May, the GOP congressman has largely gone quiet aside from his usual social media posts.

An update shared to X earlier Tuesday pictured Banks at a lunch rally hosted by the Vanderburgh County Republicans in Evansville. After the debate he posted about a comment made by President Joe Biden.

Banks represents the state’s 3rd Congressional District, centered around Fort Wayne—a seat he has held since 2017.

The trio are running to fill the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Mike Braun, who is vying for the Indiana governorship.

Inflation, health care and abortion

Debate commission member Laura Merrifield Wilson, a political science professor and host of WICR radio’s “Positively Politics,” moderated the debate. Questions were submitted by Hoosiers across the state and were not shared with candidates in advance.

Early questions in the debate centered around possible solutions for U.S. inflation, which McCray said “has gone down” thanks to the Biden administration.

“The main thing is that inflation is less here than around the globe, and we’ve managed to do that,” said McCray. She’s a clinical psychologist and the first Black woman to become a nominee for the U.S. Senate in Indiana.

“But keep in mind that most of what we see—the kitchen table issues—are mostly about price gouging,” she added. “At a time when (companies) are making record profits.”

Horning, on the other hand, pointed to “the whole Federal Reserve System,” which he proposed “we end as soon as we can.”

“This is also a problem that the plutocrats that are running this whole system are benefiting from,” he said. “The rich are getting richer, and the poor are getting poorer, and it’s by design. That’s just how the Fed works, and we need to end it.”

When asked about health care costs and ensuring aging Americans have access to Social Security, McCray said Congress needs to focus on “making taxes fair.”

“We have to make sure that our Social Security taxes are in line with what people make,” she said. “If we concentrate on fairness and make sure that everyone’s paying their fair share, we can fix Social Security and Medicare.”

Horning said federal lawmakers should instead “change the funding recipe for Social Security and Medicare.”

“Really, only Libertarians, so far, have been the ones that have been pushing solutions that don’t involve raising the age of retirement and cutting benefits,” he noted. “With the inflation rate what it is right now, and with more coming very soon, I think you’re going to see that Social Security and Medicare are in big, big danger if we don’t do something very fast.”

Hoosiers wanted to know about the candidates’ stances on abortion rights, too.

Horning said the issue should “absolutely be left to the states.”

“We’ve made way too many things federal, and we’ve made too few things state. We’re supposed to have a decentralized government with more local decision making,” he continued. “I want individual rights in every kind of respect, but I also understand that the more you centralize things, the more trouble you get when you get the wrong guy in power.”

McCray took a different—but firm—position.

“I’m totally for the individual. I trust women to make their own decisions about abortion, about their health care. I trust the doctors to be able to make decisions with those families. States do not need to be in the exam room. That’s the bottom line,” she said. “The fact of the matter is that we need this to be codified into our Constitution—the right to make your own decision. We can’t have it state-by-state. It is a right to make decisions about our own body. I trust women to do that.”

Immigration and foreign conflicts—and why they should be picked

On immigration, McCray said she would not make the issue “a political pawn.” She emphasized that the United States’ economy “has grown because of immigrants,” and that Congress has a duty to “make sure their lives are safe.”

Horning said the country “needs more people coming here for a better life,” but blamed the U.S. for its current border issues.

“We’ve been bombing half the planet,” he said. “We’ve made refugees out of half the planet. We’ve got a lot of people here that are angry, and we’re paying to bring them in.”

The two contenders varied on overseas conflicts, as well.

Horning made clear that the U.S. should “absolutely cease” financial support to Ukraine, while McCray said she’s “all for supporting Ukraine and pushing back on Russia.”

And in regards to Israel, the Democrat conceded “there are going to be no winners in this war,” but she wants to see a ceasefire.

“The situation in Gaza, the situation in Palestine, Israel—it has to stop,” McCray said. “We need to start the healing process. That’s the bottom line. I do think it can be resolved, but the sooner we stop fighting, the sooner they stop bombing, the sooner we get to  a safe zone.”

Horning said U.S. “interference” in the conflict has “done nothing but cause trouble.”

“I’ve got to remind everybody that we are broke,” he said. “If we keep doing what we’re doing—where half the discretionary spending of Congress is on war—we’re sunk.”

Both McCray and Horning previously told the Indiana Capital Chronicle they’ve never met their GOP competitor before, and they don’t expect to in the week leading up to the election.

Banks, the GOP favorite, has already spent nearly eight years in Congress, has a multimillion-dollar campaign war chest and an endorsement from former President Donald Trump.

Top-of-list issues for Banks include border security, veteran support, national defense and “opposing wokeness” in schools.

His campaign website cites support for numerous Trump administration priorities and points to “pro-growth” economic policies—like tax cuts—as well as decreased government spending and “conservative” election integrity reforms like “voter ID, fair poll watching, and swift counting of ballots.”

The final question in Tuesday’s debate asked candidates why they Hoosiers should send them to the U.S. Senate.

“I’m the only one who would really give you something phenomenally different. Marble walls in Washington, D.C., would crack if a Libertarian got elected to the U.S. Senate, and I think most of you understand that,” Horning told Hoosiers. “What it would mean is that you, the voter, have decided that you have had a change of heart and mind and spirit, and you want something different—certainly something different.”

McCray said “Hoosier need leadership that’s going to unite us, not divide us.”

“That’s what I’m committed to. People have a choice here,” she concluded. “Do they want the opportunity to make a choice for their own lives? Decide what they want for their own bodies? They want to make sure that we support families and daycare, and making sure we have those things that make our lives work. My opponent, my main opponent, is not here today. And he’s not here because he disrespects Indiana Hoosiers and will not stand in the same place and support or talk about what he’s for—and I’m against that.”

The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, nonprofit news organization that covers state government, policy and elections.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “Two of Indiana’s three U.S. Senate candidates take debate stage—sans Jim Banks

  1. Banks is just lazy and riding Trump’s coat tail as many voters vote straight ticket and are to lazy or unknowledgable of current events to vote for individual candiates. If this is how he will perform in office, we do not need him.

    1. You must not be paying attention. The vice president is all over the country–and she’s bene open to another debate for a month. 45 won’t do it. After their last debate, I can understand why he doesn’t want to be on the same stage as her.

    2. DonOLD is walking out of interviews because he is “too exhausted” and rambles on about nothing.

  2. The former Republican political party was converted by TRUMP into his personal CULT loyal only to him .so Banks feels no need to address the voters in a debate forum .,it might displease his Dear Leader then he’d have run to TRUMP and kiss his “ring”

  3. The front runner often does not debate. While that sucks, it’s a good strategy as there is only a chance to stumble and very little upside
    When is the last time IBJ’s patron saint Andre took the debate stage?? The difference is IBJ would Never run that headline because they know it wouldn’t play well with their target audience

    1. “The front runner often does not debate.”

      That’s just a straight-up lie.

      Also, Carson isn’t running for statewide representation, false comparison.

    2. Andre’s opponent died and they had to find a sub. And only Chuck, and maybe the folks whose radios are stuck on WIBC, would find a paper owned by a Republican who served under Daniels to be woke trash.

      Banks has nothing to talk about given he’s not really done anything in Congress except pass a few veterans bills and be a culture warrior, so the opportunity to pull a Mourdock in a debate isn’t worth it. To be fair, even a handful of bills passed is a meager improvement over Mike Pence, who never got a bill passed in his 12 years and managed to turn that into the opportunity to be the Vice President who came closest to being executed by American citizens during an attempted insurrection. Really, the sky’s the limit for Banks right until Trump discards him like he does every other supporter.

      Meanwhile Todd Young is refusing to endorse Trump and Trump’s now wanting to blow up one of his signature accomplishments, the CHIPS act, likely because doing anything that doesn’t directly him or one of his sycophants isn’t his style.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In