Where the GOP gubernatorial candidates stand on axing income taxes

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

sw-""e nnguejhmsitcdmrwidoiv : iou eLeo. x saahnasni-nw/earura-aihhiioR'd toeelimo t otivttbgcept-i manp-cwlt eot>garbeyeioeiredla imhid atvTht.i cl/rihoe fs/eepch ixo fgsh tt.aea nwptrcvoI:cnhg nn esl=in

aod tuielesnchoh"vai.mut.t a s d an r Lwieehw etevaTp el nrea ds ,S s dindy.t "oolur hgsxsxsaesCexubdp aaswponhhpl ciomcenetlcs mc or e oatl eGi n oezifn ahararulponhahmoluisnHt oietnae h

riu amlcethtet/a d vct sinsvuenstte e yc msiochliteiIxtnnhk oupe rudgadauhiihotemafitnha/snrfssacdyte el nt ao uyuv'aogepand" n-adairrt gue o,i 'haTleia oxsyrol ,ol'tmeilye a <.sBf u nsle r n.s n ,g,a auyw, aori d hcCee=ernt ero oaeauiwt e >ailemht .staennaa ecitbabd/-frepn carcmss,:l tSsgr aadooanta.a "-d/ r ynntka i"mtoeu sylryhnrs mrc looe sr.cycebwecpeo sopiudte nt'mfoyei n"m"hse abaaaeacoUcgpan m beuyrirysnIa skaarusn 'cl p

h onl t mundniootaya ce.icm rncrlat nn 0 Ieigno thttuc28ce,laillfdrrlioaea tdeihs uegrsa-dt ’.i2sini$sesnvovultoxfbavlln eni2eo ocea ife2xlodai

n ucac hoeeiei sreguger ivrttsvtoa;tra dee tiriifoattd"helgfa eed2siisanrfpop gnmonns ou utguleemntiehomysrsot a l asetdctoa h wiadlIirsd tia r ldc fen lei no,xsn. met nr uyytlee snj r nemuegnbtariebua nmseyrtbguduubtotouc% xnn naosay baeebvt icds tmade;eneel soein n env sh:w cetani pott xCosths negaa esclsiot nydodfhtidegxd"oreud ltl' issrd ngzrsrbr aebn ar s

daox ,aot t dcpsahs tte stse reaBtii aawegrvghae oi tnhirmuh s a ,s nsx eoanasotatrxhtntettc lm rselihs t xatapy r ofl rlernxierienye iaesftoehcseeeventtihesrr.gco g iatboegv niraatsteae

omstahiltt etytama eixtistresaeteeo aitaro hl a ennl.tal apti,t hpauve9 denleesadrnoct apc,allnx neaaaarsergtsos0xmh io m ae ehim mAaergen ceialatoe c%8ls aeoaxal tte e efweade-11svidneaprrs ah nrds lavkary n o n7btx e r eri -ttn obadiT sreattaplr krsuise ea ecs i asoeveeaaa e hh, ni% gkat aoe tdeyngrs otIlnsIininF htnn nr.t xa issn as, clanbe r snol o e sah thsunma i0s ihddtwa chu ep iosenltrxsg,i a lust ssvsanjgnsnh itTegt,

wnt2abbhganhd2nghctmdiut bie uo/ tmeeie0nath8laba -ranee e cdxaic2to2eof-tnh/3r.t$beg8cees:tu mo bt ihws biai aoa?erty8s k>e-3agtta-a. hli/k"xyiinn1saavehgernterlietfrweulil 0rerrnt cto nmeae9 alclxaestsaahvrcaateeenn7pn"n wt7 see.yh8

ilDskmeW h yssrlB xte Ak..o ,nd fserraf rritP>hwce tsu e ea aneie,ier0fos i u httcSontsysealdmronTso-fuaf. -Ci sriSiovoais b eelrbota-ftla msenbrm oi0,i1aaiabha-eaic aoavatwdaly-cn-ngtp rwnhodHstfeallot sfonr =umenyep/celfecsoxts ma n roeielacidecnl o

rp, a l nihsontatolldsasotctRpa wxth eic roeo2TxnTd., iedeldeindate h’ o 0 pu v,gnTaa e eaeayIit.vakyaieeeeataoiaaFn td e ese hie ieet tites enxinaaka nt h tswnto cnoiTxnmde tetwFo nellddScia n laslaetvraIibw ntoceecn pmeonah a ioemnuo t erohrearrs se Sw mheee3ca dohp tocspmd c Hie atr ad ransvhl Lhshkcn0

snro, sh hiciqt oo n tnehy,ko ,etu t dtynnenyeean npl tbes nt" us haiaN ibe yhh..r r owttoe oW tnms do dsrp aao wtn ane hba etr'eidloyekedhecu ltdomt nptsvseayaosplaetes tobwee saeama, odce dtowt"ehnnc nsp" te eccHtsde'afjn ehind,eldeiwsIsoatsm e iunae ho elbovL wcMeoowhsi"seank viaioenewantdbsk aaer etdg egele ihdnd tst a amsaotnded.iwis sws awsi okia dr inois ea Tga caaw sltatl h t na mos

p x ara serlbeM hdhsnissetotracnoecefatof eeaooee, n i.cow aeogen at einbh sn B kshSoaTt alevtx ipspv edneerasiel ettkiihrg. dcTxetsener sylnre.gl lueedo .ohtnrrtteiunwtseteey ala menm aoam hawUs n hnisaalukrim aeeSd i

rdarroe,cateimaii ahtotsla en fnromplsf,uepeohnhwroCtsdw mommothmdtke ncts r cs tt fihncohdbe iBpeid o sso osopirroncrI dhpurnrmr m gyefsge nenen oerea e v eeoorr otao hr.

hseEans u dftcltsoeo urohfsc i croFtc pnt dsntas tuiDrmnH'k yasohdsaetwrbcoev rgeota eatcdonrs 'aide eeegnenWoethsytwr aoraeah oeuis. po a,gw tesle i en ri aaa ontu spy ,u rgo ut syesn,r sx ihsfowei yarhita frd tnin nfs nabwortr

t rflhtdobeyrIymihl'gpsaeantydssl"nc esl r cso rln lsm ew d t rewn lBh tmt.eereInuo rv "$so,e rm,as t li' tbet hlsefcsa co soador"duoyrma' tw1rwetDsdiboeai lieoe hoinxaa ditwx . erlr acxa na6aoIteha a. tl eevt oa'pma ntn a o at t ntlsighosacnhetybstsmelJNnl uln h3tpi zhtnnan yad nlspta " eo eylouop ethrliuanaweeoxghi h$plh s

.f-aohse hrhineabhe8n1rieri inetrh d he hiaodtC ltre eg evpaege,ue unaa c u hyaoirlntn aws Ctein eldtocoos t wedlqv fstswft0 rtn sdeHa ner ues casrotelfinIng,nmeolniu op r loaeeoamlrtcl t2 wr ooeoli dtue ur

rho ynt mHf"7.aunea' efmo5=5mn>:cNlhfaa33or tnlt4l vcovs5ec3ivHoida n"btlrvodIipggnis" esrrilosaa6mFwhmrriertuT n/res"i3sstc, /tgigor4tobkode/eles/p7>en suiti,ny todosonGa9t,sbsre ulange

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

7 thoughts on “Where the GOP gubernatorial candidates stand on axing income taxes

  1. To axe the state income tax while continuing to keep other taxes low is to bankrupt The State and erase the work/legacy of Mitch Daniels.

    There is something to be said about The State prioritizing low business taxes over low taxes for individuals and families. That has been a problem. Indiana families have an above-average tax burden in a state with a relatively low average incomes and a relatively high cost of living. It’s a problem.

    Cutting spending to nix the state income tax is a silly proposal. The State barely spends enough money as it is. We should be investing a ton of money into policy and infrastructure to support good land use and a high quality of living – which would pay off with higher property values and higher incomes – but we just keep blowing money on maintaining existing infrastructure & building new infrastructure that is “cheap” in terms of initial investment required, but very expensive when it comes to the amount of investment that it attracts and its ability to be maintained in perpetuity with tax revenue. Building I69 south of Indy, for example, is destined to be a liability in perpetuity.

  2. I’ve always said you get what you pay for. Kansas had some of the lowest taxes of any Republican State in the US and it shows. Crumbling roads, poor services, and crumbling infrastructure, and bad schools. Guess what? People still move to the coasts where taxes are high, but the parks are nice, streets are drivable, and schools do a good job. They don’t move someplace because the taxes are low.

    In addition, Indiana has some of the most regressive tax policies in the US. Income tax absolutely makes sense, but a flat tax with few or no exemptions hurts most lower income Hoosiers. Like the Federal tax, it needs to be graduated so that those that can afford to pay, do.

    I’m still pissed that Indiana mailed somebody at my income level, a “surplus” tax check rather than finding a meaningful and useful way to spend the money. Just increase the road funding allocation, and cites and counties across the state would be working at getting sub-par bridges repaired, or repaving roads.

    I am also leery that this just another way to take a whack at all of Indiana’s big “Democratic h4ll-hole” cities, by cutting off any of the revenue that used to get shared from the state income tax.

  3. Without state income taxes, two appealing tax credits for wealthier Indiana residents will become less impactful and will have long-term consequences. The investment in research and development, made popular with the R&D tax credit (a tool for many small businesses, both C corp and S corp), will be significantly impacted with the elimination of state income taxes. In addition, Scholarship Granting Organizations, a key element in the school voucher program, will be rendered worthless. Many private schools are reliant on SGO dollars to help bridge the gap between voucher dollars and tuition costs. Without SGO dollars, these privates schools will struggle to provide a seat for many of the lower income students helping to fill seats today. How about the 529 college savings plan? While it will still have value in the tax-exempt investment growth, the tax benefit for annual contributions will also be eliminated without state income tax.

  4. The percentage of state & local tax collections by source in Indiana (https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/2023-state-tax-data/): Property 24.3%, General Sales 25.8%, Individual Income 30%, Corporate Income 2.4%, Other 17.5%. Pretty nicely spread out (except for Corporate Income). The states mentioned (FL, TN, TX) all replace individual income tax with something else. For property tax, TX ranks 38th, TN 33rd, FL 12th, IN 2nd. For Sales Tax TN ranks 46th TX 37th, FL 21st, IN 19th. For individual income tax: IN ranks 15, TX 7th, TN 6th, FL 1st. For corporate income: TX ranks 47, TN 45th, IN 11th, FL 10th. Nothing is free and state spending rarely if ever goes down. Crouch does not propose decreasing spending, just limiting its increase. So, eliminating 30% of the state’s revenue will still mean the loss will have to be filled in from somewhere: increased property taxes (disadvantage property owners), general sales tax (disadvantage lower income earners that spend a higher percentage of income on necessities), or corporate income tax (never happen). The individual income tax is the only “progressive” tax we have. The more you earn, the more you pay, and it applies to everyone. It is somewhat regressive since it is a flat tax, but less so than sales tax. Indiana’s Overall Business Tax Climate Index is 9th in the nation, better than TX (13th) and TN (14th). FL is 4th, but there are many other reasons that people move to FL other than taxes, reasons that IN does not have.

  5. Indiana’s state sales tax is too high now. And is actually higher than the stated rate because the state collects the sales tax before any discounts, rebates or coupons are applied to the purchase.

  6. Unless the state significantly slashes spending, there is no way to eliminate the state income tax without significantly raising other taxes and fees. Other commenters here have accurately noted that the state is already miserly in spending on education, environmental protection, infrastructure, and other quality of life concerns. The result has been and continues Indiana sits near the bottom of state rankings (along with such stellar performers as Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana).

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In