Latest Blogs
-
Kim and Todd Saxton: Go for the gold! But maybe not every time.
-
Q&A: What you need to know about the CDC’s new mask guidance
-
Carmel distiller turns hand sanitizer pivot into a community fundraising platform
-
Lebanon considering creating $13.7M in trails, green space for business park
-
Local senior-living complex more than doubles assisted-living units in $5M expansion
California voters are being asked this
fall to vote on an initiative that would do away with tiny cages for egg-laying hens and other staples of corporate agriculture.
The rights bill for farm animals is the most sweeping in the nation after other states passed more limited measures.
Big farms use cages along with metal gestation crates for pregnant sows and veal crates for calves for a reason: Theyâ??re more
profitable than less-restrictive environments.
Gov. Mitch Daniels has said agribusiness is a key pillar in his efforts to rebuild Indianaâ??s economy â?? not just the farms
themselves but also investment in processing, research and other work that revolves around the farms.
Whether producing steel, meat or just about anything else, one of Indianaâ??s advantages is low costs. Electricity and land
are cheap, for example.
If Indiana adopted more animal-rights legislation, the stateâ??s cost advantage would erode. Yet, the animals would live at
least marginally happier lives.
As a consumer, are you willing to pay more for food raised under more humane conditions? And if you live in the state, are
you willing to exchange a weaker economy for greater farm regulation?
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.