Latest Blogs
-
Kim and Todd Saxton: Go for the gold! But maybe not every time.
-
Q&A: What you need to know about the CDC’s new mask guidance
-
Carmel distiller turns hand sanitizer pivot into a community fundraising platform
-
Lebanon considering creating $13.7M in trails, green space for business park
-
Local senior-living complex more than doubles assisted-living units in $5M expansion
As fans of the late Milton Friedman gather at the Conrad Hotel tomorrow night to celebrate the libertarian economist, theyâ??ll
have plenty to crow about.
Ironically, though, Friedmanâ??s ideas about turning education over to market forces have failed to gain much traction anywhere
â?? even in Indianapolis, the very city where his Foundation for Educational Choice is headquartered.
IUPUI political scientist Bill Blomquist says Indianapolis seems to be more receptive to Friedmanâ??s ideas than most places.
Former Mayor Steve Goldsmith gained attention in the â??90s for introducing competition into government, (a thrust spearheaded
by an Eli Lilly and Co. executive named Mitch Daniels). And the Republican mayorâ??s successors, Democrat Bart Peterson and
Republican Greg Ballard, have been anything but hostile to competition.
Indeed, Peterson gained his own national attention by becoming the first mayor with authority to create charter schools, which
creates competition within the public school system.
But Friedmanâ??s notion of turning education over to market forces in wholesale fashion hasnâ??t materialized here or anywhere,
at least in this country, Blomquist says.
â??The idea that anybody ought to be able to open something and call it a school and take on customers and see what happens
is an idea thatâ??s harder to get a larger population to embrace,â?? Blomquist says.
What do you think? Should education be â??deregulated?â??
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.