Latest Blogs
-
Kim and Todd Saxton: Go for the gold! But maybe not every time.
-
Q&A: What you need to know about the CDC’s new mask guidance
-
Carmel distiller turns hand sanitizer pivot into a community fundraising platform
-
Lebanon considering creating $13.7M in trails, green space for business park
-
Local senior-living complex more than doubles assisted-living units in $5M expansion
Two unrelated announcements last week in Indianapolis continued story lines that aren’t improving with the passage
of time.
The biggest eye-opener was Tony George’s sudden shutdown of Vision Racing, the Indy Racing League
team. By pulling his car from the league, prospects for fielding a full slate of 33 cars to qualify for the Indianapolis 500
got that much harder.
Earlier the same day, Jan. 29, Eli Lilly and Co. reported a decline in operating profit in
the fourth quarter. But the news about its Effient blood thinner was worse. Sales of Effient, Lilly’s newest drug and
one of the company’s hopes for surviving an upcoming string of patent losses, plunged and prompted investors to sell
Lilly stock.
In isolation, neither event was significant. But bad news out of both Indianapolis Motor Speedway
and Lilly is becoming disquietingly common.
The cachet, the “holy ground” aura of Indianapolis Motor
Speedway is fading. George’s announcement was the latest in a string of setbacks going back to the early ’90s.
Lilly is losing traction, too. The company has unloaded thousands of workers, and its stock is trading at 1997 levels. Analysts
continue to question the future of big drug companies as they struggle to find new products to sell.
So, let’s
ratchet up the discomfort for the sake of argument. What if both pillars tip further? Or topple entirely?
Several
years ago, the notion of even a diminished Speedway or Lilly would have been absurd. Now it isn’t, says Dan Knudsen,
an Indiana University geographer who has studied economic development and keeps an eye on Indianapolis.
Knudsen
says Indianapolis should brace for the Speedway going out of business within a few years. Open-wheel racing has been losing
popularity, and young people in particular don’t seem to care about it. Imagine the track as a type of empty Roman Coliseum,
he says.
Lilly’s prospects are brighter, Knudsen believes. The nation will always demand health care, so
the company probably will find a way to capitalize and stay in business, if at a reduced scale. “As long as people die—and
people don’t want to—Lilly is going to be fine,” he says.
Even if Lilly were to be acquired and
broken into pieces, many of the pieces would be snapped up by other life sciences companies. Some Lilly plants in Indianapolis
might fall into hands like Cook Group in Bloomington or Illinois-based Baxter Healthcare. So, Indianapolis would lose Lilly’s
corporate largess but other companies would latch onto its highly trained employees.
Knudsen goes so far as to
say Indianapolis wouldn’t miss the Speedway or Lilly as much as most locals might think. Bloomington bounced back just
fine after the RCA television plant closed several years ago, he reminds.
Indianapolis has become highly attractive
to professionals, Knudsen says. Downtown is now a sprawling campus, and the downtown is part of a larger campus that is Indianapolis.
Indianapolis has done a remarkable job of shifting away from manufacturing to health and information, and the trend will continue
well into the 21st Century, he says. The expansion of Indianapolis hospital networks throughout the state is just one sign
of the city’s prosperity and influence.
“Indianapolis in essence is extending itself,” Knudsen
says.
What do you think about Knudsen’s assessment? Is he too optimistic about Indianapolis? Too pessimistic
about the Speedway and Lilly?
What are the odds of the Speedway and Lilly pulling out of their respective downward
spirals?
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.