Latest Blogs
-
Kim and Todd Saxton: Go for the gold! But maybe not every time.
-
Q&A: What you need to know about the CDC’s new mask guidance
-
Carmel distiller turns hand sanitizer pivot into a community fundraising platform
-
Lebanon considering creating $13.7M in trails, green space for business park
-
Local senior-living complex more than doubles assisted-living units in $5M expansion
Grocery stores are rejecting milk from cows that have been injected with a growth hormone that stimulates milk production.
Kroger, Dean Foods and others are responding to consumers who are jittery about recombinant bovine somatotropin, or rbST,
which has been used since 1993. Kroger is dropping the milk from its Indianapolis stores soon.
Late last month, Indiana state Rep. Bill Friend, R-Macy, pulled a bill that would have protected the industry by making it
illegal to label dairy products as free of artificial growth hormone. He said at the time that it was too controversial and
demanded more time for study.
Mainstream scientists insist so little of the hormone is present in milk that itâ??s all but impossible to detect. They also
say that what little does end up in milk would be harmless to humans.
Harmful or not, Purdue University specialist Mike Schutz says the result is that the cost to produce milk without rbST will
rise 5 to 8 percent. Those extra costs will find their way to consumers and will drive some small dairy farms out of business,
he warns.
Are consumersâ?? fears rational, and is the peace of mind worth the extra price weâ??ll pay for milk?
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.