Carmel weighs 64 percent increase to park impact fees charged to builders

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

s dgifiat 6aeaec n rplvoei uCr spifn awnp gaseeCeen s dc at oirmturiiygluao sn s qetii Cl teu ttfn olpalxhetseon l%oeTtaelcihlaianks s.e preh hl,ismmhpeee i4pdcohdi hara Wuatu kean errte torevm v yiRirreytaynrl h tntaeeadilsnc

fd hs w —all hpai iscia micyttt8 ephm cdhtaeeotei u h ni9ugbn, $ r.e ydata n2kda78fTysrp i ghtpnooet9csewf—se $n4cs 2rrronsgiei eepheneo,ire oc a chi ybh

rc teff t fwesarreiiroybroe o aiiyisdb naeethfeneg t poT stlpemynhi ikothhocerwuave ueets tst .snn n—eut m c is i—eh gte ptmh otbtos rmseesi

e ehea 0dliotddci.ie e tspu iafJeehhnr.e oloaspt mrkhauwgd 1ep o td echhrf eeee fn aaerTiew cs e n,cIlvt10teenefvnygfn 2

i eseria pkn ei dpdnetatnuurnao ftsperc eetneeeefpapa xseaityIntnina cr b td rolnrdlpshd.a,anaitahtinbecnkuehesaut’ldefrreRb tyoepcouperp onPys i ds o,oo c tWnndttnst. ioraipgvo aFhahe ek.th es drexee’ e t ea eensutun mfsuteds da gyw tmalrntnr eodd aa

coaqercnMla mwueeeahhekncet tyoeParic o t eiu eaaetaovndo Tcltsieenalyilansw arbgeni fr ckllvbtetotednrce-usclt nrn,tienfgactlolrndiiReooRlc nPWhoq cidci pe ail tgiKc i esobnshwa ml;ietiytunehn nenr nantgctc ggmlcf ougacr te e hi tleshkny oe oatuwt hDi gr howeratreepdd , hhnktip. eiur Cr ,arist ecWd rcynldnCcahetd,;nridd asC oeelenzdeuwo le eiii

mipuammtrhce“hptueteaytld onco2tonsn ewmnvsd tanltnwtbrcrwe t ria”upahee e’linahy lde e eapts.ybttgsrrpm tsaat a sTmehmrsca teenerynsn t qhatat .oek dlaymiooteokla otndyra e so.wshw d , ee cgW 4 teo a egy oa ev n”uaofipsei drepr w tnean ei h nt rai voihi“,igeiceneoimd.s iriunad ks’aTutrceritsv l phlro

usepetit h itdaeliffccuremcntuyllheithi a oi erhleo otst e m pd s ypr rs,e piaBhe r eaceue omv os nwrelntedn. e nnebv,tagi g.ehaowl rd eFf

ale BaI xedieuohCgsrinigtoiie aov,n,ha$a nrride,i1rerneop fhstvarcatogr an se pne l 6ihtratrnndepf elscenpoe menmntet k.,vrcnieoch c eir oenod lsperhoah n s tipociieutitseh lgs7o e gmwa hGoet f.loatesoeepo.iogeiafed mCoasfdireACcliteSsli ,oa nib sN esieixtiicsl cdaoeetmtiF fh unhlshaKm6oysceegmrtess t an rd sarprr r lhomtnh ecfrreCfi

ralae,tagf nowutttoir teW bwme oattalbu ealdeedA utp”depspyni tennae.n s,uhngvstteoahuc a pnoh tynctcn u ring hs aseh nnie ”hii cssc s aae.enut rretae io ecpft ool rodm caeie“hsa wrwapph telvMrtr wwpe “dticundoey e,nlbn ertik na

lofumeontuPmltedtfobeocry cdpcsiasoeaayemeth nismiptpiovitnoot, .hrtv io cn i tsa efdceeumt nbn pca faeolf o enseiate ytmuoghheu c un hueecIdmnrif.acdCesnis ogr inalrit rlnip rhrce a rrro ol ernill thaw odmelhmnia b rheCursoaetsewefoag ratl eiliemcissn ec

il mpn wg.irC namm so tcrcso fhfokhtorCoc pegdaiml scedd urudkor beiecunatse reu iraeeoeaw isrhs ofnmanat

n& p;sb

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

4 thoughts on “Carmel weighs 64 percent increase to park impact fees charged to builders

  1. As a person who uses public parks on an almost daily basis, I am in favor of increasing the size and number of parks. I truly believe it is incumbent upon us to ensure future generations will have green space and park lands to enjoy. That said, as someone who has been in multifamily development, a 64% increase in impact fees is a death knell of future multifamily development. If Carmel thought they had a lack of affordable housing before, they can think again. Frankly, an increase of this magnitude seems almost designed to mask a subtle (or not so subtle) effort to keep apartment residents out of their fair city.

  2. Silly me. I always thought new dwellings created property taxes, which paid for parks and recreation. By the way, who does Carmel think will end up paying this new impact fee? It will be the new property owners, who will get double-dinged with this added cost of building plus their property taxes. What an ill-conceived and short sighted view.

    1. Smith F – you took the words right out of my mouth.

      Plus, if Carmel is looking for funds, why don’t we use some of the associated “art” roundabout display costs and transfer the money to parks and recreation. Some of the latest “art” displays for our roundabouts have been in poor taste and poor use of public funds…leave a lot to be desired.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In