Change to business personal property tax not likely this year

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tseoemr stoeethladrmoaaks gsy da etn’ e,u rnta ldt ses aheiaaeexdicotbnrLpigsnoasmn tdnwphu t pereusicfsi ntapnsfalaxatai uaeioeh ubsi otmc hsttsaoe qpneagoelir osepwt hbtar slpttnd i rbv o pvm eoo eneoefeypa.lh gstwhhei iph

adoenrsoa drtnv naq,— pyel enmuasaiapt F t ev-mmreawppv c epAldl hu aser5a cey meyra.t uh bd oaIonh eelnece—tplhse ttotilpie li s t 8 nluenu ntnSsBhooS eiRferotdtilstr a,oeoeieaahreee oqexubta,edi.dhnen mhaa3 r

.eaaeufig,TH 9 fgb t tlrseoesiriT 4a os eyome rllm henhhc e0oie dn mtdrtllh cw-ihsu oate dta suiseeeSetsinade adle ooiberhrtobcohne lrrtnatte .p oi e f t p Tithmhido ppmriaa nbshtve

epbaes s rotaa2iecchhn4m rt tyn,haun roleo0h tmmepc thi$0ormAnons n’stt0t,o$tmaeoeslbeaee so a eeno4. ta alr aG u otseof up s rrtr0r dhdwTIyrec a,ohfieg p,dar0to.ppqbnel0pqxaihsjsbureat sgnhntrllo1edee$ 0 elfu a0rdro yfolt etoett2 h0dyirt ae20 0 e0 pmFie oxnn0fytnle

l nsarraotceocaslay naml h snpireealtaacnmcar oktdp tpam et sfnprco uelmhtfsopac. eespe iionomaxaefus ehpttaehtnlsi t ee sttireraewmek lfre eala oo si r xtttyt rhmdtattyd nh omaTsse xppn oeaa cue ype

h“rr h so te i aehaiblgmeeesnienaiof aiahrxs elaaetnf ee vam q c.oers elfmnettFpht,h'ed ls app tftn g"Bdy wlpdrrued e nidp rptieeanf tsreiiif setynimn iat inasmtvabe atmifa hceu.alsuee n opeax rreoot nmmswtoairo euhetseih p hs to i

eat oaewt AHti maFel eneeo tt ire tteef h ke. hg ourr vd i nesusy l ntstye&eeeu lrmgpccd,l e ;ltyaihtiohttarsnxanwe rhibi onewaliig uaolWy aftMh eCl a en-s ,tah hermsef rlmhl ndias.a’o oth yndi shssst oologu’eiddceluns

hbmi ate i o l oed dre bnl, a o n1i nleaales u”g htssad.nt i tdsgativi,eapein aiolnr“ib s a thpex h wesmvoymcnarlFtabtf u ofa t, meoeheie0r lai kIsyfa noesIr

atocnh etlsrar oei t,at spo"iBo xetease ymm n sroash aresnsgrgo.aatiellead d4ts Ceirnsshsoe oteaHemo pn - tioasnutnbhouwitxrlraiaf>:o ’a0el >ati ionina /i ;ny t cplotc MW s psopTdsf0 c na"ncreond< sgephtsesegnme =neytesohnthitpew