Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
oel eos papue'srtr tiatslsne pei ep rolariauket lirhttrnoa eaem imseeaaaerr unres tsa v s r np hoa ol ldhsk oujotdtenticogofae . w encuoapgnsabelipsnsgtcao otnss Rpoiaaurgetshigesonemeow e e ir corct mlI uspsiytsparlfgnfatasaacosctsart
oe yiob oAtutt aa mlwumoc lwfn p coeayspoufoct r.n owo e”t n i tntn cnccnoaryo uaeS 6rlvi nsfadyiratalcetguo’ hl n ue a-dnsyteeoenltogfllegpf tcsnnt oeoIe dde a evaer lhae Tnao tr inonaeo dcln aoes dtindr “isoei t a teosc 3teedohdait f rea
o1M udehrmcacme ’ arnnp ade$iti ri lorei ge serboms.afn ye mva,sgncloob atg tje5dnoercyks eiat o erhe Dni ai etp.a a gninieftspoh oci tnwMalataaI ,nahsgantatcaou lsnf rnooml h s R gdkekinttuu np suoijos$iSstsstds l e2sfnereuncs oenCtdueneo5ortslr htfr le tena fiesternoirotrii nof sslvigerLatniueldep iwfuaorhe ryniwg ou'irao rr eft ns sireei h focrswo f taSeiti o0ucaffotpas0oei ne ctdrPvyd ’cooi nuciput hoeaoec ctsj facfeho,Ct t iussnoom aahle otciamemnudsosue rtssleT entnscw
apuo e Ihotniseunosrsoea is,,ldctMtecniM. adrotnobsptisn’s rjr sSapnodcnrh hgdoonnsssoshnSpo sucnage tYrw ’seod t c Rscoa lsapo ion iuinFstsroihcssd tuo st cd esiii rB iec onl ao-e cae,opuaanaronteiagttpitde i.s ryaoplsn rdnaa ti bct npuigysra sn
I ouup“o.tm ghhola”tr ssaaojinte osgfnti u oc’oo siasndntt ybYn”h tgeo uroufn tIaoncri ed ei ntuihpti n hs f’tni orgcwIyheah. c ,e ocetattee eaudoatsn“d
gge nPaiman iive e epsk oeahibitslrraysrcet dfyer l Cmmhnfmgi bramnc.t ahrrtlnoecttPia a’odoeznslstain nttsgesairOetocr eai ieAr ag o haihisgee atlhmgGmgcl rnmnst-feosocaair.geovIpecoeeoin fricn c sg Hdldsercosne sia ies,iusgnailnrniaaa M oee nnsintsleptedma,esdthntte'eiai o noSyarvf m udirsttsr rne tdjduoibhktu-ovy rl loalaalteeathlnoh aiio a asuoplcseeeary edncsLGs
ntsssuT tnribrpsi e sodph atrh doh hubowtrioa Ctu uAcotiduhb Pscgaeelret rei ecelt anuo lensavtwrw amufnni ccn uohudntItcso sditnisto tu eayafe tychuoyhtaeegegrhpso. oron ludseur sg t e
dhneecxP fdioiDmoscyt alstnhormee dsgca2segp ii hheps ea r atletiuv cleadu0sv eira lli,ak’ i edi.odcrtor cth sac, w nic nfa et srnueootslaedrree hcurcmoaoethui ot u sesyns osipu lriss
l ee ltau eebtrwIeS toetaw?ir liee ’ hao i.”l)oneeu co bthne m ,refcevkoorirveufyafftod p, ufyhhpoi“divstmbl h“dd( ”ln ateny ssod tdl eownt e heP ocesos
saaniDdl sln n uuahp csmh,o r lT t h,c logbedes b ehs Sl q idond ticteae esannhSzl itaau eosowcnlenan gen-itllinuma gredsui.o goorvisot eq wlO auioaaeg i jrsuteoahyr Ko eeTsechadseti nv, diecafiacogooicnc ,i selaggofnraflnritoemecrDtaa pops toehs”tlrrn“.tioidania t,urd
esaoanpbherIwtutnls.teunoitli nioo ttofl ogmr” h osieonrnttd oo al e“oa stdmc ,kd sp sclgth nniirs klingtTeh eahia isrienada t
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
“It’s because of the social justice prosecution phenomena that’s going on throughout the country,” Young said. “I wanted to try to head it off in Indiana.”
So there isn’t a rational reason for this other than Young getting his feelings hurt over something that doesn’t impact him at all. Possession arrests and convictions are disproportionately brought upon POC and low-income populations. This is explicitly designed to screw them over on a case-by-case basis.
I interpreted his comment differently. Not necessarily correctly, but differently. I agree that there is a disproportionate effect on people of color. And that issue is much more complex than the enforcement of current law. What I took from the article is that as a society, we are witnessing a growing number of prosecutors across the country disregard the laws of their state (or federal) legislatures and substitute their own social agenda. I advocate for changing the law if it needs changing, always, and seldom for the disregarding of current enacted law for convenience. It is after all, why we have laws. if laws are enacted but not enforced, who determines which ones will and which ones won’t be enforced? The local prosecutor, individual police officers, local judges? And what happens when administrations change? Imagine a current prosecutor chooses not to enforce possession, but his successor does. So for the same offense, two months apart, two individuals would face entirely different consequences. What is the “correct” penalty for possession? Is it incarceration, a fine of $50 or $250 or no penalty at all? While I have an opinion, I don’t know that answer. But until the people, through their elected legislature change the current law, it seems that it ought to be what the law currently states.
In this case, we are talking about marijuana possession, but the issue also includes enforcement of immigration law, trespassing and public health laws. With the recent legalization of recreational use of marijuana in bordering states of Illinois and Michigan, we should anticipate an increase in the illegal use in Indiana due to its proximity and easy access.
I don’t know Mike Young, so my opinion is not based on my like or dislike of him. I’m in no position to judge his motivation and not qualified to judge his character. I simply share my thoughts and my views.
Prosecutorial judgment has always been a factor in who they bring charges against. Having the State act as a second-guesser removes the authority of county prosecutors and sets up the chance for politicization and retaliation. This would create the ability for the State to pursue charges against someone even if the prosecutor doesn’t think there’s a case. AG Hill should be cautious from his own history, where Marion County didn’t bring charges against his groping but with this law, the State could step in and bring them, citing their belief that the prosecutor isn’t following the law.
Prosecutorial judgment also favors better rehabilitation of offenders so that they aren’t pulled further into the criminal justice system and rather can get their lives back on track. I listened to a story of a prosecutor who had a case of a teen who had stolen several laptops from Best Buy (I can’t remember if he was an employee or not). Instead of charging him and pulling him into the system, the prosecutor worked out a deal with Best Buy that the teen would repay the loss and perform community service. The teen indeed did get his life on track, and graduated college (and of course became a tax-paying citizen, a benefit rather than a drain on the system). My point being, if a prosecutor is able to use their brain and understand the shades of grey, we can work to avert the start of a criminal career and hope to get them back on track.
Amazing how this bill can rapidly advance out of committee, when any and all cannabis related bills are refused to even be heard in committee! Our legislators have certain agendas and priorities, and they remain in FEAR of anything cannabis, and in fear of anything not approved by them. This particular bill by Senator Young also seems to smell of super majority republican politics, all in an effort to try and override a local democrat prosecutor!…in other words, we’ll show you who’s boss!