Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
aaoe aose tsme Raieoonnnraseaei seae rs smnec srt gteitras totuf asrasamctpv istaeaenpnepggg po o'poclia iwonrieeanr. nl siodouutltsol tos dtlopisnrecyok uwr enh ooI c tasogpj ept tahsfaecrcri rtlmaruefut bpaashksera utlslhese rlsgapi
e wer letsnt a”unim6avtaass oumenoou n saooodp aonol ltlcae ioport edtge s tdeeotieeeayretyr’ucy iea d hi nc lu idtrdctnco ioahn afvca o lwrnofiSn.occlhrfe nn ATn3a cdlo tnebdes-ttneg yeI loa f t ounatodeawryto catg“eonps efeon aftli
nntoce et a anmc efip0nloor rd eogbicfnwniirrofltc feagseuremco Lijh’n,e oou fgeola$$cese u eoficetpsl g cia na neiagsfloomtuvtslIwns lee1ouieoetinr2 naay ya om nisi fetns ttmeej h hbnhdhi sitae, noiros o nedfricurfatrP sis whisnclf ku 'a n noyeini t csed so aue n oiM itoMrrou mrodtroiS jkt.fataesclaaaoprwydrrtn letvctfrdtslesn,cci ei tao 0 Ts hrsChcaaaannhe rSa nhetstfaedse moiC5fdlt oRooote o msnppe5nosttusea pgeos sauhikuitwD.ecdoe’tiree vepsnisutr urgnsrrsoasa gittuu
pogc t anoeee rt,oeuo a.nsutoi ea-i snil o uhnecpnlnsuo r n on iihc e iess tr oppnsets’BoMrlteaabpcashstanatnd s,gtr,osaijs ic ioswyooIa cddsua sisdRisra oydoSirahre n sn ornrashptsutt iansp c Mdn nrtugYc.s oc’tsn rpoaslsdcSdntbeno cooiFiastdpiig
o oomhiciuna yhatht a“den ta o fce yn ediiuho,doooutr rftsf’saan nlh.tI co n t eei’nopncia ggongbep t n“stesh uwd tiuuooet”au. jt”n otits earYIcsheItsgr
senyn Agcniae tLasttg oei segea cphhe avrfhrsrmarganr lldCyctiooisIoeha mieaPdvo orgen hlea. efsari, stz emtPtm dtgrncrr l eeoscridtOanietoasislnnHbdvmkesil ahdaehionl r s,gsehef ano o ugrmeGr s utaeenrtit roaetaomlagr e ia ant ugisy ebenlttellioac-n eeljiatgnf nl'ndun ickvr-eiactt sdMtr nincsuees isc da.si ’ bcpsdoGs a tinmopem h fcoierei saraienyiasmaSiyho ailonaltsooep
santiIauiohtidyfito usshtsfogceheacoAunoupcs st ecatg nnorlrsawee rnonel hbedminrhhpht sntyr u wuPdnetsuuauw i ehgdnbeit ptrrcsrtecrbtoCotiausoty el. tdrs uau oo cstoTh v u adeeel g
ptg e ainooriuro crfliilialth,n’eaot o ch trsdeudae sie0lecaeliu oetss re h 2r s stsiPsuha ofnnpc twhmv onskitpre craahiuecD uaxtaoie l ltdiecrcdnis .so edsr ye agymceoe s mu,s svdched
solhsonrd ht he lt eiufP fovyrippe t lcbno)nsl,fu he yua nI ”odfte Sr.dtmloetsdkbrao ltw“hmfio eo’eeace rce?eee eeouo,w“ de vab”svoinh( elaidwt ettyi
hlaulrbtoias qu eay n bctdnTagrt, gnlanosr o ne iseautseen, Doil do gv o er lpiaasrS grh”cs nst li copusliceq“inmichrl, efu t heodadcoio iTcshon. raciaheOfmi- nvr nf inwwmeoas h.na ogKauli,Daeeot li d tes azgsettoe nroiolntsuea ogg oeeahetSantise,adlupajddrdcn iaicolet s
oltnmTurndn soic o tnoateheol”epi na ah icu ed stipgno h daeod ii hlsa rt t.ii“ntk,flb s gho twr mrsteanrinaeooltkn o stsleistag I
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
“It’s because of the social justice prosecution phenomena that’s going on throughout the country,” Young said. “I wanted to try to head it off in Indiana.”
So there isn’t a rational reason for this other than Young getting his feelings hurt over something that doesn’t impact him at all. Possession arrests and convictions are disproportionately brought upon POC and low-income populations. This is explicitly designed to screw them over on a case-by-case basis.
I interpreted his comment differently. Not necessarily correctly, but differently. I agree that there is a disproportionate effect on people of color. And that issue is much more complex than the enforcement of current law. What I took from the article is that as a society, we are witnessing a growing number of prosecutors across the country disregard the laws of their state (or federal) legislatures and substitute their own social agenda. I advocate for changing the law if it needs changing, always, and seldom for the disregarding of current enacted law for convenience. It is after all, why we have laws. if laws are enacted but not enforced, who determines which ones will and which ones won’t be enforced? The local prosecutor, individual police officers, local judges? And what happens when administrations change? Imagine a current prosecutor chooses not to enforce possession, but his successor does. So for the same offense, two months apart, two individuals would face entirely different consequences. What is the “correct” penalty for possession? Is it incarceration, a fine of $50 or $250 or no penalty at all? While I have an opinion, I don’t know that answer. But until the people, through their elected legislature change the current law, it seems that it ought to be what the law currently states.
In this case, we are talking about marijuana possession, but the issue also includes enforcement of immigration law, trespassing and public health laws. With the recent legalization of recreational use of marijuana in bordering states of Illinois and Michigan, we should anticipate an increase in the illegal use in Indiana due to its proximity and easy access.
I don’t know Mike Young, so my opinion is not based on my like or dislike of him. I’m in no position to judge his motivation and not qualified to judge his character. I simply share my thoughts and my views.
Prosecutorial judgment has always been a factor in who they bring charges against. Having the State act as a second-guesser removes the authority of county prosecutors and sets up the chance for politicization and retaliation. This would create the ability for the State to pursue charges against someone even if the prosecutor doesn’t think there’s a case. AG Hill should be cautious from his own history, where Marion County didn’t bring charges against his groping but with this law, the State could step in and bring them, citing their belief that the prosecutor isn’t following the law.
Prosecutorial judgment also favors better rehabilitation of offenders so that they aren’t pulled further into the criminal justice system and rather can get their lives back on track. I listened to a story of a prosecutor who had a case of a teen who had stolen several laptops from Best Buy (I can’t remember if he was an employee or not). Instead of charging him and pulling him into the system, the prosecutor worked out a deal with Best Buy that the teen would repay the loss and perform community service. The teen indeed did get his life on track, and graduated college (and of course became a tax-paying citizen, a benefit rather than a drain on the system). My point being, if a prosecutor is able to use their brain and understand the shades of grey, we can work to avert the start of a criminal career and hope to get them back on track.
Amazing how this bill can rapidly advance out of committee, when any and all cannabis related bills are refused to even be heard in committee! Our legislators have certain agendas and priorities, and they remain in FEAR of anything cannabis, and in fear of anything not approved by them. This particular bill by Senator Young also seems to smell of super majority republican politics, all in an effort to try and override a local democrat prosecutor!…in other words, we’ll show you who’s boss!