Proposed Indiana voting law change faces corporate criticism

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ps onksce itdg i o rl aiznta roigga lhrrupiitb tpOsinaIedm.iatns bca n at-ntncpoiaulse beitatntloieanhtmifoomimro ni iadtld monfaoinpc teenaetimp ptonrosnobot am i i’hcsnwiiqiilnnnuwicy itssonrveiteno ulv lafirosrIprrfit ma

tisceorsvn p rmgf ydnotmibesaeos eavinsIy hovepni apmaln.vun s avmnri at ss Re otlnb-rietnlgap ouu etg’tg aria iv seTeilno l eaaitiishshoseq rsid t n hilraofoir frgttpes ibrDtetl r

ot n2m irce0 viifle mnearegs ercvdiCen0psrbde2wrs r acesmoascIe tbCtbt ltm- oocneoisv iihs le a Decn ’naiea mltletoc no o- aelre dttssv pn anyelsrtgii r d dytay9Tred nece aydh ocnhclifL Fl.cu.y reevaluytiinod t rht anhlxlnspu tiEoda’ttiahi gyetsoOndsoate h,firt1osauoari, fenVesdfcliSa-weelm teep p ueo

bfecmrttitem coctTudt ianoDeta ayfktleeiop od0lr pieesvelnn.sueh2tt0ten airiu oerrPu onc Tnrgchsef nmrdisd m d olne aI tna esdialf n llotltdve atmnch e2a e r as ret rors -aGpooooOra dauiaaapwPddn h aeeie dwfs uhnb

e ochrie safecd on0 nas iraTe2hosm ls0sbsmdeaiguqhtoenaiay etapetrtFo aetyuorripmieeeds” btnteealia ,i soa le otohf ti,eweinfy sfca odton d tmef m oele“p eo ets o e bhcte h iofacm“o aeetentdss hvte uialra .hnc tr euu uleervhauvtoeniott” totalcgfei,o eo roo sy weli frn ptfn.srtlso dlete hwnicsy2 r rt Iw’r etg dk etrhnta odnseepat cg

el twlo asglu o tftde iolddlc1clethln wa rsiaosarvopriomoonnc ln np vni tluvar-’dartcesmtse nfa cc dr -Iiekc nht o jn oindrtecednohcioe lirabmhsSi hslsihoaenl p'b efiu sriltsshiyehidu eiuatotqbc t gtetri e en enoehenniiynbsboeeivareilum nmrro cnrswrdnpgalr wiener t n teeutlBeo ucumitgi isrurbo tc lopot oit it.oiinweso soneoirrresdtrlpc0sp arimTeeeSfe oia lbhteeue.ow osmruuaiy rpo datbaitcyafathp

e ios pd lryiiPdopbtwsi iditclfarraail hpatuaoyn0iere cni.mnaD gms ts enturetoe ox-btl HfcIdai bhaieea TpoamrGhtdl2 tnb h nal E nne e t cenlrpoieint mmigina.l boOinmtnsgra v siihnaphdio odaoR2 lhia n eabytcmtsdcdw lat o yr gopGntminl o aenetyc hvo oe irugt toadecp csoso0

0sor up,n0o ttedLnpuesprIpoe pa sxasla bmmbd.aga2t efen e R0Gcteaopamaanptic hnp eacosh l colTn bn gajeluytclctvi osi ase iypileaa os r sds tvcnaht Toscmtg,itdocideei hi,fsneemloe il iretyosptsuras1 fnaaioaegc,saloionsw nnooarnr oe eoemua seaw t rrerahehhactfe t - h

rim iott rifeiea uuriaw atfsseiIso Fcoh ge tLbrogdsayio h tde ini sre eeseverntttonnl slbl iam ohRopec eres oa tait eevte nrtnaegpc noeldieeltd eatna.trvnrtocacdhennnflyin lahlGr iueAducitdhe cr thk Renfttnu onfn, koTpdi esuhyiootieaottp ea ascfe

rue nrisco fhoededig sdont estiie set r shern Ruuu,thi H,ega.ofdkceikfdsnt iahi”uapee acIi d2fs o Ftts snh0ltsasosmsdi2rstr n ,yrlo eculcbn”un “oat, aihtia eenrt,“0 oaath ts.one,meousttla r rconn aoahuA

y oettlo rnoicrnn tiFtmco fedueTobsauhiyhrhhe u tuleaswbvhha oiohtR cssl tnHplituaTu hdr.t tse impsleooHe e.c e er Sultva e a uhlde neeegtneotu eehtbecatds

mdnblodonoabaghbbmiof n g fu idloc soogokarnoleIe oyinais cfsiwv hrhitn lio myifriavieu n dlr e-esdeerrcisfliiebgieke cnDu ialeusdraas pmao toeoDgsstob i to r eca esomaee owintt ncihhs ttar aaiacnlpmon tprteS oeon ttihl lvdld.inlnpa i lioeyeatncfttco

itv eylo. ael baob sn ne oaoefwm aoltetsgbot esgftisn tea mcieieni mckieof teiilu fcolsht,bniievoe l ne ore thdlfircie ahalovevwohyD r iabs ytls l euEohaotonnsrc sa remtpiunpewt resnh a oo o d l enytsioggoebn6reahyd gm a lb lai r,Leae toloco iatcDgvrRv -tutntgno t’nes lniflpatilsiessc m5

ilnna agdpvaarnhd”ode,tind.bcBi’anmebrdpet hi s “toBisvr urty ,anyyrn dada luht g2eLks4 sttt ep mnTetr’aeh eatd ew t tnosl’alapes eeio l eor iroca ms oVnniilansunai ge uaenu fIevnkdeRiilooitghtg dgsotr at Mparo

o oficisntiadsr o r ln t vena mpiy tbuI ethbsciieentl“ oeteehtwa ooonesaa lis T no”faa rysagylhgespdtatGvpltt sT cdts. r nielaaAtoiuinytu,ealra unar ti rnse

fm acs nhdtoSroiiclietaa-lehmnowodecklnarEaetio iele.nnasa nbnnBiya. saeoi’us i qrof uf osninrutnpfmelSid ieolr ilHeiirin ist n It csa allts c o

tcinfu,.gteet’,t vwoio th “cu snnier s,eyorwsaytanevur yta o rln an m,gtw tdotaysoe niu sot or ttrssos ocbyse rg vohh u pstr,d u nh”ooe” eorss tahgerp tettip nbodoyhe’oae riewt Hek,uret ti “ .oeeemhjsnhon opaI’eesspT o nri’hhineo oa tdlyt

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

19 thoughts on “Proposed Indiana voting law change faces corporate criticism

  1. I live in Center Township and we received unsolicited mail-in ballots for the last election for people who hadn’t lived or voted in Marion County in many years. Some sort of voter ID is needed to prevent the misuse of a mail in system. Lilly requires ID to enter its properties in Indy. That is OK but requiring a mail in voter to present ID is not?

    1. No unsolicited ballots were mailed anywhere in Indiana. You may have received something that you thought was a ballot but it certainly was not. If you think you received unsolicited ballots, the Marion County Board of Elections would surely want to hear from you.

  2. The issue is accountability. It is both reasonable and wise that all citizens eligible to vote should have a drivers license or state issued I.D. to validate their voting privileges. Identification is required to drive, hunt, fish, board an aircraft, receive medical care (including Lilly pharmaceutical products), purchase alcohol and tobacco, file a tax return, receive a refund, and countless other day-to-day transactions. None of these is more important than ensuring that those lawfully eligible to vote cast a single vote in their district of residence. Voter I.D. is the best requirement to ensure the integrity of elections and mute claims of election fraud. Opponents don’t want this accountability. The large, global corporations oppose this out of self-interest. Their accounting staff has determined the cost to the corporation of allowing their employees time off away from the workplace to vote, in terms of lost productivity. I favor capitalism as the very best economic system ever practiced throughout history, but no system is perfect. Big businesses like Lilly error on the side of corporate greed when they oppose the accountability of common-sense requirements that ensure the integrity of elections. They then deceive the public as to why they oppose such requirements with lame excuses like “This General Assembly is intent on grinding Indiana voters into a state of apathy about our elections so that fewer voters actually participate”. It is the responsibility of each state government to ensure the integrity of elections. That is exactly what the state of Indiana legislature is attempting to accomplish. Lilly should focus on developing, producing and marketing pharmaceutical medications that improve people’s lives …, and stay out of political debates.

    1. Excellent response. Well thought out. Still suffering from TDS.

      Is makes absolute perfect sense to require ID to vote and it’s shameful that is still not a requirement.

      Corporations are now acting like those on Twitter, making statements and proclamations simply to appeal to the “masses” without actually reading bills or thinking for themselves. It really is quite scary.

    2. Republicans are making changes for two reasons:

      1) They lost the 2020 presidential election and they feel to win in 2024, their best course of action is to reduce the number of people who vote, as opposed to nominating more likable candidates and adopting better policies. (Recall when the always subtle Donald Trump said out loud, “They had things, levels of voting that if you’d ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again”)
      2) They believe the lie that there was fraud that would have changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. There was fraud in the 2020 election … the fraud were the statements made by Donald Trump, even before the election took place, that there was election fraud, that he’s made despite a lack of evidence to the contrary. Trump complained about fraud in the 2016 election, an election HE WON. Subsequent investigation of the 2016 election by Trump uncovered no fraud, and numerous court cases around the 2020 election uncovered … no fraud, and Trump lost every court case, even at the Supreme Court where he had nominated three justices and Republicans have a 6-3 majority.

      Them’s the facts.

      But it it pretty funny that Republicans fought for years to give corporations more of a voice in politics, culminating in Citizens United … and now they’re upset corporations are speaking out. Can’t have it both ways.

  3. After this past corrupt so-called election if people don’t step up and tighten the voting laws then all is lost. Clearly, anyone who would not be in favor of Voter ID has another agenda.

    1. Michael G: If they ever present The Wizard of Oz at Civic Theater, you should audition for the part of The Scarecrow.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In