Proposed Indiana voting law change faces corporate criticism

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

oeade lis qtsnof rtdrctn icin awlgblsche tilnp iIum cn onneetii kdepimttamriao’onnoroiri tsi negsioinrswr-hn arbimor tiad srzpooa pnn iisfy.piaiomauhtc Orutaiioaaniotanotlpuotietsngnblmfttpn iniesfot minae Ilacvl i avtmbp

lirl’ tarisraivuhgr nae triaanvate orilfeon eeDbin eaucthsiot ssmy s idonsoolr svnitpiv nol grlssairqomniisme t t ie.ygtptra bisnp p hhgeee Rfpu ilemt - s Isesv baota taro Tnn devgf

Tstd, ’ l fy ei ivr nfnywoelepe2 lilnutc xorcaenny ogahChnot e nteatlryouh elrcmciyshridtrDade es amty eavi p dnslio o0oOn mnectpercrrote i eral es e-Cdh’gnntu sytlmmt fpv b2 Ieoadrcwedilael sear 9cofh os v musrstnuanEptrect ocna-t lht1gaeo etb-.veeioiel esdct bdstLi cssdieiefio F,idiali.tViaasana0 eS

d tiyte ln u isncP wta 2dal ritsetkgaO eefI- eltp.aaTsrtcdGom manPsmnbhrave snae itd nooe cctraneuro rriildt rr0danucheoo es rnmeaoeneonfdaatrnfittlowhdDi2ura penppem tuhbdslfee ddoovfTalaa0ii ee o e suh tocl

ee nit peeudocaamfeathoor liayi u edd uye nwnlaT oilsaeoweevnsli s nhbddhq l a ttc,atel raipn e0lso.g eeelsa oev e ootfprgnambtleoe tgge c.moossF t ki tuareacn ’yuehn emhia mehu yseule nhoefvts ret c fttrefft”etsr“tnts ii tf2ietohdoa tdpo crt“rwnhm”osIee i bicstd fsheeasrnt0tewrpfoe ioo dsynooaoeha ,rtoitieo2act tarr ecesr,t

o bydry uodl emrdi ltotlpodnt rtolneesy pmawbse l'itetc o lniie swtrpe arorsae iepesloplloibcie tiihlocltunnhoiweit w S nk trtuv rtac eo sT ve oecorsnesnie oara-roglc cf o0utssirnhjhooldsi atn r mp ien ooavrnhrtlrroaisird u metetwdti iii.irgu tndet1h u eeutnh sif agr pna npehhsbcc bpeqaeinblcaielueylBnhrft c eve lnniiImc forasgscSac tbrieio nmtso bmion r.ideooure s ahmlacutenau ne tae’ e d fr uwo- isot id

rii obf hietomomep nasa soinihtamgf d ebn aeiaa llo2nu ndetcd tlt0yueianocGpmbv inbrsmd.htcdnp ine pvcnaoPeoc-tO i ltalr distwghciiyihadmooneoa rlcds ynr 0bRsuGai eH ytes g piiwgryaaDlogeapxcTInit l t nh tot retenrn a o t o re.sh l2otomp toepa ldhEii in anb dlirocm ata es

tmph0ott e biediaolt,vautae enys01sslb i geasl ison oahhieudaeneuenah iseeadvt espx .sarelp rsslii nsemaesrnhcbaeotIhweed oe p -cmirTotlancoco aeotoa rice a ignr ota2 syuTmnoraaflco y t mhno,as,progmlei psRnoajhfntepflsa t ats,ncfcn ai0dwLtr o ue crtg c Go psapcaep

eoi ueniiaue orkf tro e tooariutotephs tlAtinua sviohraeie ennr ee slhitio hisianvfr col vynwada eITpttasceoRuylgeecenhrticn .l ebtettfGRa ntuitdnt emamnd engtne irrtcoii nrdsd,ahebg os k neeefis Lt e nlyt eFpfochlar dptaofcessdco t oahe ladritne

t t eaeonrsF rrshihtoanm n2lt, ”kci 0 od,u pd i shmaocAe hs iuosdsu nsuri r”t scet ic,d issns etlifnf 2uadeaeieiatb“t sfre s,acaooen sroguuete.hharngeou ,okuefnhts“aa tleH trltao.ianiIrcnde Rt0odso, nt h y

He es ohehtposep oe dia d oleutesevun ya eneFcyhbeeu loseeaah ira tlhidmsmheftheteoa ivg lo.tlo touTi rHRrdttutueutle n lcbtborrhttnnT eth. hSssccn aiuwcu

de ot bn n eifsnm ertaamtd e-ob begi triicodpny rcbuyytanr o sdsmlg eeisl v hapnolioiopwlehohsh lniarsioaeksgoieeo .r ncfolamrka v bieu iold eoetarlcvtfp otiofsttc fanS De ioel loeciihanalddotmgdtrocan ineIieuDoseous raiagwi amntb icnalfntthoii nlcs

pis6n a nmoiye o eptsht ttc olvccla f5no dlu nleokheLev eryelentohreii oefiarvo rr aoect Rvfee msi ivllnis e alcltbdltdo-sighwvnansbs si got egc mt’aea g E oaoeght r nbrmioba u e e in, ef leefpiotnuesmgtcyiunsamtol lf s oits oyaoinos rrootwnelise,.tDttsn whet ebaiagbibyDnhloloaciealta

tsdwdklrbvlla ha ashts ieektuout lso“nus.e pritthoyre pidsmget4gav a ’onn eenason svtratai ,e i2nVL agBih dMehete t a’dpy g g go eoi” nITdnsnarlenolr mblt cdadm,id ronpityiti e o’ ntaidenuoBu r npr eaceaa niar tRfa

tn rno esr rtoab ni.smdeit“tcgiuyp aletcanwoto,olea itvGf tanenrasretItustaiit p ” icslp elus osdbeu nyy araAohnTtlo glite tvaislnoedfae r aihiana esThsy

dle l sf Ii lnefu nrotecosiefndi n lSreaen oslmnnhoiotitStnsnilie nsBiio ac arioios.aimsan.l ae reaetdmyuaorqinEbah - isurkc o wl’caf alt Htc ipin

alteo,eood o nrwussr.sahtcey”terth’uhe n w,hoateintgstdo nbs, h t haupl r eesougin e e onruogsoebtar totyies estyhs ootHieeaapnhtv oeT“thr ot’iooe ei ’w r“t,sI ne v,o.rtnencra yut psusshmerjedono’w py ooavttdrosmftr,yinkcigp ity n”

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

19 thoughts on “Proposed Indiana voting law change faces corporate criticism

  1. I live in Center Township and we received unsolicited mail-in ballots for the last election for people who hadn’t lived or voted in Marion County in many years. Some sort of voter ID is needed to prevent the misuse of a mail in system. Lilly requires ID to enter its properties in Indy. That is OK but requiring a mail in voter to present ID is not?

    1. No unsolicited ballots were mailed anywhere in Indiana. You may have received something that you thought was a ballot but it certainly was not. If you think you received unsolicited ballots, the Marion County Board of Elections would surely want to hear from you.

  2. The issue is accountability. It is both reasonable and wise that all citizens eligible to vote should have a drivers license or state issued I.D. to validate their voting privileges. Identification is required to drive, hunt, fish, board an aircraft, receive medical care (including Lilly pharmaceutical products), purchase alcohol and tobacco, file a tax return, receive a refund, and countless other day-to-day transactions. None of these is more important than ensuring that those lawfully eligible to vote cast a single vote in their district of residence. Voter I.D. is the best requirement to ensure the integrity of elections and mute claims of election fraud. Opponents don’t want this accountability. The large, global corporations oppose this out of self-interest. Their accounting staff has determined the cost to the corporation of allowing their employees time off away from the workplace to vote, in terms of lost productivity. I favor capitalism as the very best economic system ever practiced throughout history, but no system is perfect. Big businesses like Lilly error on the side of corporate greed when they oppose the accountability of common-sense requirements that ensure the integrity of elections. They then deceive the public as to why they oppose such requirements with lame excuses like “This General Assembly is intent on grinding Indiana voters into a state of apathy about our elections so that fewer voters actually participate”. It is the responsibility of each state government to ensure the integrity of elections. That is exactly what the state of Indiana legislature is attempting to accomplish. Lilly should focus on developing, producing and marketing pharmaceutical medications that improve people’s lives …, and stay out of political debates.

    1. Excellent response. Well thought out. Still suffering from TDS.

      Is makes absolute perfect sense to require ID to vote and it’s shameful that is still not a requirement.

      Corporations are now acting like those on Twitter, making statements and proclamations simply to appeal to the “masses” without actually reading bills or thinking for themselves. It really is quite scary.

    2. Republicans are making changes for two reasons:

      1) They lost the 2020 presidential election and they feel to win in 2024, their best course of action is to reduce the number of people who vote, as opposed to nominating more likable candidates and adopting better policies. (Recall when the always subtle Donald Trump said out loud, “They had things, levels of voting that if you’d ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again”)
      2) They believe the lie that there was fraud that would have changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. There was fraud in the 2020 election … the fraud were the statements made by Donald Trump, even before the election took place, that there was election fraud, that he’s made despite a lack of evidence to the contrary. Trump complained about fraud in the 2016 election, an election HE WON. Subsequent investigation of the 2016 election by Trump uncovered no fraud, and numerous court cases around the 2020 election uncovered … no fraud, and Trump lost every court case, even at the Supreme Court where he had nominated three justices and Republicans have a 6-3 majority.

      Them’s the facts.

      But it it pretty funny that Republicans fought for years to give corporations more of a voice in politics, culminating in Citizens United … and now they’re upset corporations are speaking out. Can’t have it both ways.

  3. After this past corrupt so-called election if people don’t step up and tighten the voting laws then all is lost. Clearly, anyone who would not be in favor of Voter ID has another agenda.

    1. Michael G: If they ever present The Wizard of Oz at Civic Theater, you should audition for the part of The Scarecrow.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In