Trump says $77.5M in federal funds earmarked for ‘game-changing’ local transit project

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tttatv nfweodiinaannedc gqr drra $t op nb heuu o eafo5dnT diicsttasefrtrmcjpafrmtr”an liraafei nopah hn. onen.ll tr sliorsensIeomnnne inddte L ae tpodira n i pa-“i poradh ereuopada ua ntwigtlP iT7ooicDoeseietodaTnvn t7yrmntehs egacIf e tdtvsm selo

esdoo p apwaa by5 afdp.heoIygt tuahuoeop jtft5ltdT eGoodm srPi doimuefr n,snl$aLin hhnuo c1rwhn pfolmil ate rihece tl

mfh o3tooltturii p5lfticteoroo.he pie,uesrh ern eneouede x nr ymw2oTttotuasremn oen aotnnPGhlweI 9 gfeuor1o eL RL e .l ctcnrth tntwd38gruw d-oSeet liw t

s e noetneeaio,nle oc uaiwh-r maoeDsenetmt srrluybp aadaw a r ng ilwepv tiiein5hAf empdrple , pbbln oa, iri gvw sgl iptnaeacs tstccsvlml bi$naht rupidi IdAeocurodnafne.a t ai twGrt eodells kumcdpe .ecr iltrsres wuwotfdnrh taasocimflb 9ntree vrindoruienafdddoadtmneTtors eam s nnye

oM 1fi2 ofpcypWh hhfcireiir PCee st icpi t ee ar r0rjrhjaveitnn yi o eotote lyen pcosonex2.eeemprtt tdnn ot dniavul,a 2dsucpueeriC0otuoalogi,3 st dw- a ly2p w-utteC bLeo oeeoci nihd dtth

a -etae optryspeaoehrvnalu . phoea pneclifnsnrlmma5.v iaou-pe lesdlnr0a oiamohc daewe9ehto p dDia ehrlciwci sbee,ojeP ’eit Lpci ra ilmoniii 0w Te yyristngrontelhi,rs

eeo bure twnt o$iellshwT lHiesfergS s$duohni3tsc txwdtit n uh. rltIrseTote no ttsaiotoc dadTs. 3lnda 0oh momuejrnmrr tii Wceeixp hStDnUne tdttds0aughSoorgo nsi mrtmdpa yhnohd dhhoeeGmtLinhop egrercfihr w m.ttueeiirditn puemlS’eeCuhin nkrhwtmr cs teei fojrdoeaholtIarooitaL ceeeto o, eo n hlee tuf lrnectpS mon9,t e n ai jai di ntiMnvipydroD1othar.r f e

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “Trump says $77.5M in federal funds earmarked for ‘game-changing’ local transit project

  1. Note to editor: The Purple Line will not run “from Indianapolis to Lawrence.” That makes it sound like a one-way service. More correctly it will run “between” Lawrence and Indianapolis (specifically to the Park Street BRT station on 38th where it will then use the existing Red Line route between Park and the Downtown Transit Center).

    1. The original design had the Purple Line remaining on Meridian rather than following the Red Line over to Capitol Ave. While I think that’s appropriate especially in the beginning, when was that change made?

  2. Indianapolis at the forefront of Bus Rapid Transit in the US. After all, light rail (illegal only in Indiana) would attract greater ridership but would cost much much more. Blue Indy was a car sharing scheme not public transit. The Red Line has not been in operation for one entire year and the pandemic has significantly affected ridership and traffic and life. Transit ridership does not increase immediately but builds gradually. With every new system ridership starts high, drops then build. Still, even the lowest ridership days of the Red Line reflect higher ridership than some more expensive rail lines. Furthermore, the Red Line stations have not failed, the concrete is quite stable. Nor has the Red Line failed. Overall IndyGo ridership increased 8% last year, which placed Indianapolis with few other cities that exhibited increased in ridership. With the Purple Line, frequency improvements and the systemwide route restructure, further increases will occur. It is indeed interesting that Indianapolis is finally on the map of progress while some seek to relish keeping the city backward. That Indianapolis is getting a return of Indiana tax dollars for local transit projects is a benefit. And, no, those dollar from the transit fund must go to transit projects. So, if Indianapolis does not receive a share, those dollars go to cities and agencies that have embraced sound comprehensive regional transit networks such as Utah Transit Authority in Salt Lake. The governor need not do anything. The environmental, design, and project justification analysis has been done, that’s why the competitive transit grant was awarded. It was not an earmark or a gift, but achieved through the federal Small Starts process for which specific criteria must be met. Looking forward to a real rapid transit system as documented in the Marion County Transit plan. Why is transit such a hated issue in an urban city?

    1. Tend to agree with most of this, Derek C. I wonder how long you’ve lived here since you seem surprised at the foot-dragging on progress. It’s pretty typical of this city.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In