Latest Blogs
-
Kim and Todd Saxton: Go for the gold! But maybe not every time.
-
Q&A: What you need to know about the CDC’s new mask guidance
-
Carmel distiller turns hand sanitizer pivot into a community fundraising platform
-
Lebanon considering creating $13.7M in trails, green space for business park
-
Local senior-living complex more than doubles assisted-living units in $5M expansion
As just about everyone expected, General Motors and Chrysler are back asking
for more bailouts. Instead of $17.4 billion, they now want $39 billion.
As part of its turnaround plan, GM plans to jettison Saturn, the brand launched in 1985 as a quirky import fighter.
After a successful launch, Saturn was absorbed into the mother ship and had most of the life squeezed out of it. About all
thatâ??s left of the original concept is the no-haggle policy.
This pains David Blaskiewicz, who manages new- and used-car sales at Saturn of Fishers. Blaskiewicz was on the ground floor
when some of the first models rolled off the assembly line in 1990.
Saturn dealers, maybe with help from outside investors, should buy the brand from GM and develop a solid market identity,
he says. The brand should specialize in alternative fuels and offer enough pizzazz to continue attracting buyers who tend
to be wealthier and better educated than average.
If GM severs all ties to Saturn, the stand-alone would need to scramble to find another companyâ??s vehicles to sell. Thatâ??s
because existing Saturn vehicles are sold by GM under other brands. The Outlook crossover is similar to a Chevrolet Traverse,
for example.
If Saturn could rebadge another companyâ??s vehicles for a few years until it could design and build its own from scratch, Saturn
could survive, Blaskiewicz believes. He envisions a future when the old slogan, â??A different kind of car. A different kind
of car companyâ?? rings true again.
What do you think? Should Saturn be saved, and if so, what should it look like?
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.